DEVELOPMENT OF REFLEXIVE READINESS OF STUDENTS TO USE INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING A FOREIGN LANGUAGE
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2021-4-177-187
The active nature of modern higher education today urgently requires the introduction into its content of the formation of students’ reflective competencies, which can be said as an important direction of modernization of education in general. This applies, in particular, to teaching a foreign language, where the use of interactive technologies also becomes an essential educational resource, when, under conditions of constant updating of information, its reflexive generalization becomes so necessary. In this regard, the use of interactive technologies by students in the teaching process of a foreign language from the point of view of their reflexive readiness for this becomes especially relevant, since students do not yet have sufficient ability to identify cause-and-effect relationships in the linguistic aspects of the language being studied. Hence, the formulation of the problem of the development of students’ reflexive readiness to use interactive technologies in the teaching process of a foreign language is conditioned by the need to update the university education system, where there are certain contradictions. This concerns, for example, the requirements for solving the problem of expanding the student’s reflective activity and the insufficient methodological development of the qualitative introduction of reflection into the process of teaching a foreign language, taking into account the use of interactive technologies. In this regard, this article is devoted to understanding the methodological aspects of the reflexive skills of university students, in particular, through interactive technologies. Thus, the purpose of this work was to consider the aspects of the development of students’ reflective readiness to use interactive technologies in the teaching process of a foreign language.
Keywords: university students, foreign language, teaching process, reflexive activity, reflexive readiness, interactive technologies, linguistic personality, mental activity, introspection, self-esteem, self-organization
References:
1. Sinagatullin I. M. The impact of globalization on education. New York: Nova, 2006. 221 p.
2. Bizyayeva A. A. Refleksivnyye protsessy v soznanii i deyatel’nosti uchitelya. Dis. ... kand. psikhol. nauk [Reflexive processes in the mind and activity of the teacher. Dis. can. of psi. sci.]. Мoscow, 1993. 238 p. (in Russian).
3. Kurilenko N. S., Chechet V. V. Interaktivnaya pedagogika [Interactive pedagogy]. Moscow, Belyy Veter Publ., 2004. 80 p. (in Russian).
4. Shchedrovitskiy G. P. Refleksiya v deyatel’nosti [Reflection in activity]. Voprosy metodologii, 1994, no. 4, pp. 76–121 (in Russian).
5. Berulava G. A. et al. Rol’ stereotipov psikhicheskoy aktivnosti v razvitii lichnosti [The role of stereotypes of mental activity in the development of personality]. Мoscow, Gumanitarnaya nauka Publ., 2010. 157 p. (in Russian).
6. Bodalev A. A. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye problemy formirovaniya lichnosti [Psychological and pedagogical problems of personality formation]. Lichnost’ i obshcheniye [Personality and communication]. 1995. Pp. 9–21 (in Russian).
7. Panina T. S., Vavilova L. N. Sovremennyye sposoby aktivizatsii obucheniya: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy [Modern ways of learning activation: manual for students of higher educational institutions]. Ed. T. S. Panina. Мoscow, Akademiya Publ., 2007. 176 p. (in Russian).
8. Vulfov B. Z., Kharkin V. N. Pedagogika refleksii. Vzglyad na professional’nuyu podgotovku uchitelya [Pedagogy of reflection. A look at teacher training]. Мoscow, 1995. 112 p. (in Russian).
9. Petrovskiy V. A. Lichnost’ v psikhologii: paradigma sub”yektnosti [Personality in psychology: the paradigm of subjectivity]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 1996. 512 p. (in Russian).
10. Sokolova L. A. Refleksivnyy komponent deyatel’nosti kak neobkhodimoye usloviye razvitiya uchitelya i uchashchikhsya [Reflexive component of activity as a necessary condition for the development of teachers and students]. Inostrannyye yazyki v shkole, 2005, no. 1, pp. 19–26 (in Russian).
11. Zeyer E. F., Pavlova A. M., Symanyuk E. E. Modernizatsiya professional’nogo obrazovaniya: Kompetentnostnyy podkhod [Modernization of professional education: A competence-based approach]. Мoscow, MPSI Publ., 2005. 216 p. (in Russian).
12. Kosolapova M. A. Tekhnologicheskiye podkhody v organizatsii professional’noy podgotovki k pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti v vysshey shkole [Technological approaches in the organization of professional training for teaching in higher education]. Tomsk, 2007. 177 p. (in Russian).
13. Raven Dzh. Kompetentnost’ v sovremennom obshchestve: vyyavleniye, razvitiye i realizatsiya. Perevod s angliyskogo [Competence in modern society: identification, development and implementation. Translation from English]. Мoscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2002. 396 p. (in Russian).
14. Belozertseva T. V. Pedagogicheskaya tekhnologiya formirovaniya refleksii shkol’nikov v protsesse obucheniya. Dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Pedagogical technology of formation of students’ reflection in the learning process. Diss. doct. of ped. sci.]. Chelyabinsk, 2000. 195 p. (in Russian).
15. Khodos E. A., Butenko A. B. Kriticheskoye myshleniye: metod, teoriya, praktika: uchebnoye posobiye dlya prepodavateley i studentov pedagogicheskikh vuzov [Critical thinking: method, theory, practice: manual for teachers and students of pedagogical universities]. Мoscow, Miros Publ., 2002. Pp. 133–139 (in Russian).
16. Kazimirskaya I. I., Torkhova A. V., Bychkovskiy P. M. Refleksivnaya tekhnologiya: uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye dlya studentov pedagogicheskikh spetsial’nostey [Reflexive technology: educational and methodical manual for students of pedagogical specialties]. Minsk, BSU Publ., 2004. Pp. 104–106 (in Russian).
17. Alekseyev N. G. Sposobnost’ k refleksii kak sushchestvennyy moment intellektual’noy kul’tury spetsialista [The ability to reflect as an essential element of intellectual culture]. Novosibirsk, 1994. Pр. 31–56 (in Russian).
18. Astafurova T. N. Strategii kommunikativnogo povedeniya v professional’no-znachimykh situatsiyakh mezhkul’turnogo obshcheniya (lingvisticheskiy i didakticheskiy aspekty). Dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Strategies of communicative behavior in professionally significant situations of intercultural communication (linguistic and didactic aspects). Diss. doct. of ped. sci.]. Мoscow, 1997. 324 p. (in Russian).
19. Panfilova A. P. Mozgovyye shturmy v kollektivnom prinyatii resheniy [Brainstorming in collective decision-making]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2005. 48 p. (in Russian).
20. Beloshitskiy A. B., Berezhnaya I. F. Stanovleniye sub”yektnosti studentov v obrazovatelnom protsesse vuza [The process of formation students’ subjectivity in the educational process of the university]. Pedagogika, 2006, no. 5, pp. 60–67 (in Russian).
21. Bulankina N. E. Problema effektivnogo kul’turnogo samoopredeleniya lichnosti v poliyazykovom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve [Problem of effective cultural self-determination of the individual in a multilingual educational space]. Мoscow, APKiPRO Publ., 2002. 208 p. (in Russian).
22. Sorokovykh G. V. Sub”yektno-deyatel’nostnyy podkhod v lingvisticheskoy podgotovke studentov [Subject-activity approach in the linguistic training of students]. Мoscow, MshU Publ., 2003.178 p. (in Russian).
23. Bandura A. Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. Gestalt Theory. 1980. Vol. 2. No. 34. Pр. 147–174.
24. Crumly C. Pedagogies for Student-Centered Learning: Online and On-Ground. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2014.
25. Radford J. Reflections on introspections. American Psychologist. 1974. Vol. 29. Pр. 245–250.
26. Thorne S. L., Black R. W. Language and Literacy Development in Computer-mediated Contexts and Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2007. Vol. 27. Pр. 133–160.
27. Passov E. I. Osnovy kommunikativnoy metodiki obucheniya inoyazychnomu obshcheniyu [Fundamentals of communicative methods of teaching a foreign language communication]. Мosccow, Russkiy Yazyk Publ., 1989. 276 p. (in Russian).
28. Sysoyev P. V., Evstigneyev M. N. Metodika obucheniya inostrannomu yazyku s ispol’zovaniyem novykh informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh internet-tekhnologiy: uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Methods of teaching a foreign language using new information and communication Internet technologies: an educational and methodological guide]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2009. 182 p. (in Russian).
29. Khaleyeva I. I. Osnovy teorii obucheniya ponimaniyu inoyazychnoy rechi (podgotovka perevodchikov) [Fundamentals of the theory of teaching a foreign language comprehension (training of translators)]. Мoscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1989. 238 p. (in Russian).
30. Astvatsaturov G. O. Priyеmy obratnoy svyazi. Pops-formula [Feedback techniques. PRES-formula] (in Russian). URL: http://didaktor.ru/priyomy-obratnoj-svyazi-pops-formula (accessed 24 March 2021).
( 367.89 kB ) 
( 357.68 kB )
Issue: 4, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: INNOVATIVE PROCESSES IN EDUCATION
Pages: 177 — 187
Downloads: 705