Pedagogical review
RU EN






Today: 24.03.2023
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №2 STUDENTS’ EDUCATION RESULTS ESTIMATION AS A PROBLEM OF THE MODERN BASIC SCHOOL STANDARD
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Issues
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board and Editorial Council
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
EBSCO
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

Яндекс.Метрика Яндекс.Метрика

STUDENTS’ EDUCATION RESULTS ESTIMATION AS A PROBLEM OF THE MODERN BASIC SCHOOL STANDARD

Rumbeshta Elena Anatolyevna, Nikolaeva Svetlana Leonidovna

DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2018-2-83-94

Information About Author:

Rumbeshta E. A., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: erumbeshta@mail.ru Nikolaeva S. L., school no. 49 (ul. Mokrushina, 10, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634045). E-mail: nikolaevasveta@rambler.ru

The problems of modern education in the primary school are reflected. The introduction of Federal State Educational Standard in the primary school, as several authors of the analyzed studies have noted, is insufficiently prepared. In particular, little attention is paid to creativity in the learning process. The main disadvantage of Federal State Educational Standard is the lack of a single tool for assessing the different groups of activity skills that need to be formed among schoolchildren. The analysis of the diagnostic materials used in the training process – from school to university – shows that the grades of the introduced learning outcomes in the form of competencies are gradually being developed in universities. The same thing happens in colleges. In school education, the evaluation of learning outcomes is now being actively developed in a junior school, while in a basic school such materials are not sufficient. The manifested problem of lack of creativity is solved by introducing lessons-problematizations into the learning process, in fact – the lessons of obtaining new knowledge, a new way of knowing. At the same time students develop the ability to solve problems, regulative and communicative skills. Diagnostics of these skills is carried out on the basis of developed cards, in which the elements of skills are presented. The cards are filled by students, members of training or problem groups, or student experts. This type of diagnosis teaches students selfevaluation, helps the teacher and parents to follow the progress of the student in the activity and mastering the subject.

Keywords: deficiencies standard, lessons on the formation of skills to solve problems, regulatory and communicative skills, diagnostics of skills on the basis of developed cards

References:

1. Khutorskoy A. V. Deyatel’nost’ kak soderzhaniye obrazovaniya [Activities as the content of education]. Narodnoye obrazovaniye, 2003, no 8, p. 107 (in Russian).

2. Khutorskoy A. V. 12 oshibok FGOS [12 Federal State Educational Standard errors]. Personal’nyy sayt – Khronika bytiya [Personal site – The Chronicle of Being] (in Russian). URL: http: // khutorskoy.ru/be/2016/0410/ (accessed 26 February 2018).

3. Khutorskoy A. V. Klyuchevyye kompetentsii kak komponent lichnostno-oriyentirovannoy paradigmy obrazovaniya [Core competencies as a component of the personality-oriented education paradigm]. Uchenik v obnovlyayushcheysya shkole: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [A pupil in an updated school: collection of scientifi c articles]. Moscow, Institute of General Secondary Education of the Russian Academy of Education Publ., 2002. pp. 135–152 (in Russian).

4. Kovalenko Ye. N., Kuzub N. M. Otsenka urovnya formirovaniya professional’nykh kompetentsiy studentov – budushchikh uchiteley matematiki [Assessment of the level of formation of professional competencies of students – future mathematics teachers]. Vestnik IrGTU – Bulletin of Irkutsk State Technical University, 2015, no. 11 (106), pp. 327–330 (in Russian).

5. Yakovleva A. G. Opredeleniye pokazateley sformirovannosti metodicheskikh kompetentsiy magistra pedagogiki [Indicator for defi nition of forming methodological competences master of pedagogy]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, vol. 10 (112), pp. 38–40 (in Russian).

6. Kamaleyeva A. R., Gruzkova S. Yu., Russkova O. B. Diagnosticheskiy instrumentariy otsenivaniya rezul’tatov obucheniya v sisteme professional’nogo obrazovaniya [The diagnostic tools of estimation of training results the system of vocational education]. Vestnik TGPU – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, vol. 11 (152), pp. 134–139 (in Russian).

7. Rumbeshta Ye. A. Formirovaniye i otsenka kompetentsiy studentov FMF – uchiteley fi ziki [Formation and assessment of the competences of students of the FMF – teachers of physics]. Prepodavaniye yestestvennykh nauk, matematiki i informatiki v vuze i shkole: sbornik materialov X Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii (31 oktyabrya – 1 noyabrya 2017 g.) [Teaching of natural sciences, mathematics and computer science in high school and school: a collection of materials of X International Scientifi c and Methodological Conference (October 31 – November 1, 2017)]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2017. pp. 184–188 (in Russian).

8. Kharat’yanova I. S. Sistema otsenki dostizheniya planiruyemykh rezul’tatov osvoyeniya obshcheobrazovatel’nykh programm v nachal’noy shkole [System for assessing the achievement of planned results of general education programs in primary school]. Narodnoye obrazovaniye, 2015, no. 7, pp. 127–134 (in Russian).

9. Rumbeshta Ye. A. Obucheniye shkol’nikov resheniyu uchebnykh i obrazovatel’nykh problem v protsesse sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti kak sredstvo formirovaniya universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy i kompetentsiy: metodicheskoye posobiye dlya uchiteley shkol, prepodavateley vuzov, studentov pedagogicheskikh vuzov [Teaching schoolchildren to solve educational problems in the process of joint activity as a means of forming universal educational activities and competences: methodical manual for teachers of schools, university teachers, students of pedagogical universities]. Tomsk, Tomsk Regional Institute for Advanced Training and Retraining of Educators Publ., 2014. 68 p. (in Russian).

10. Primernaya osnovnaya obrazovatel’naya programma obrazovatel’nogo uchrezhdeniya. Osnovnaya shkola [Approximate basic educational program of an educational institution. Primary school. Comp. E. S. Savinov]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 2011. 342 p. (in Russian).

11. Leont’yev A. N. Analiz deyatel’nosti [The analysis of activity]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya – Bulletin of the Moscow State University. Psychology, 1983, no. 2, pp. 24–32 (in Russian).

12. Nikolayeva S. L. Razrabotka i ispol’zovaniye refl eksivnykh kart dlya analiza kachestva sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti pri reshenii uchebnykh problem [Development and use of refl exive maps for analyzing the quality of joint activities in solving educational problems]. Prepodavaniye yestestvennykh nauk, matematiki i informatiki v vuze i shkole: sbornik materialov Х Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii (31 oktyabrya – 1 noyabrya 2017 g.) [Teaching of natural sciences, mathematics and computer science in the university and school: a collection of materials of the X International Scientifi c and Methodological Conference (October 31 – November 1, 2017)]. Tomsk, 2017. Pp. 50–54 (in Russian).

rumbeshta_e._a._83_94_2_20_2018.pdf ( 447.1 kB ) rumbeshta_e._a._83_94_2_20_2018.zip ( 437.76 kB )

Issue: 2, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: GENERAL AND INCLUSIVE EDUCATION

Pages: 83 — 94

Downloads: 613

For citation:


© 2023 Pedagogical Review

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU