Psychological safety of Russian and Chinese students living in the campus dormitory
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2024-5-143-153
Higher education is supposed to create a safe psychological environment for students, which is necessary for rapid adaptation, comfort of learning and personal development. However, there is a lot of literature on psychological safety, empirical studies are lacking at present. Our study is aimed at describing the personal component of psychological safety in risk groups and revealing the cultural effect in the perception of the educational environment in students, living in a dormitory, including foreigners. The method included a survey of 61 Russian and 62 Chinese students of Perm State University. We used the personality autonomy questionnaire to study the relationship between personality and environment. The attitude to the environment was measured using a spatial semantic differential. We have developed a questionnaire for registering cultural affiliation. The findings show that environment attitude is related to the student’s ability to create trusting, close relationships with people. The relationships quality is a connecting element in the structure of psychological safety for Chinese students. Russian students also assess environment safety by reliability category. It was revealed that person autonomy is connected with the attitude and perception to safe of space. Cultural differences allow students to identify different criteria for evaluating a space as psychologically safe.
Keywords: psychological safety, university environment, dormitory, cultural characteristics, semantic assessment, personal psychological space
References:
1. Spartakyan N. S., Sinyakova M. G. Urovni analiza problemy psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti pedagoga v sovremennykh issledovaniyakh [Levels of analysis of the problem of psychological safety of a teacher in modern research]. Insayt – Insight, 2012, no. 4 (7), pp. 102–113 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.17853/2686-8970-2021-4-102-113 (accessed 4 January 2024).
2. Baeva I. A. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ studentov, prozhivayushchikh v obshchezhitii: problemy i resursy [Psychological safety of students living in the hostel: problems and resources]. Izvestiya RGPU imeni A. I. Gertsena – Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciencesim, 2015, no. 174, pp. 36–44 (in Russian).
3. Tosheva H. B. O nekotorykh voprosakh adaptatsii studentov k studencheskoy zhizni v usloviyakh obshchezhitiya [On some issues related to students’’ adaptation to the life under the conditions of hostel]. Uchyonyye zapiski Khudzhandskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. akademika B. Gafurova. Gumanitarnyye nauki – Scientific Notes, 2017, no. 1 (50), pp. 214-218 (in Russian).
4. Dinh Thi Thien Ai. Psikhologo-akmeologicheskiye faktory obespecheniya psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti lichnosti inostrannykh studentov v processe obucheniya v rossiyskih vuzakh [Psychological and acmeological factors of support of foreign students’ personal psychological security in the process of training in Russian universities]. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika – Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy, 2016, no. 3, pp. 46–47 (in Russian).
5. Zhdanova S. Yu., Kraeva V. S. Osobennosti vospriyatiya zhiloy prostranstvennoy sredy rossiyskimi i kitayskimi studentami [The distinctive featuresof perception of living space by russian and chinese students]. Razvitiye cheloveka v sovremennom mire – Human Development in the Modern World, 2018, no. 1, pp. 99–104 (in Russian).
6. Gamova S. N., Krasova T. D., Chuikova Zh. V. Nauchnyye podkhody k izucheniyu psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti v otechestvennykh i zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh [Scientific approaches to the study of psychological safety in domestic and foreign research]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya – World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, no. 4, pp. 1–9 (in Russian). URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/30PDMN420.pdf (accessed 4 January 2024).
7. Cole C., O’Connell A., Marhefka J., Jablokow K., Mohammad S., Ritter S., & Miller S. How Long Until We Are (Psychologically) Safe? A Longitudinal Investigation of Psychological Safety in Virtual Engineering Design Teams in Education. Design Computing and Cognition’22. Cham, Springer International Publishing, 2023. Pp. 767–784.
8. Turner S., Harder N., Martin D., & Gillman L. Psychological safety in simulation: Perspectives of nursing students and faculty. Nurse Education Today, 105712. 2023. pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105712
9. Baeva I. A., Volkova E. N., Laktionova E. B. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ obrazovatel’noy sredy: razvitiye lichnosti [Psychological safety of the educational environment: personality development]. Moscow, Nestoristoriya Publ., 2011. 272 p. (in Russian).
10. Baeva I. A. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ v obrazovanii [Psychological safety in education]. Saint Petersburg, Soyuz Publ., 2002. 271 p. (in Russian).
11. Ponomareva E. Yu. Zadachi i soderzhaniye psikhologicheskogo soprovozhdeniya obrazovatel’nogo protsessa v vysshey shkole [Objectives and content of psychological support of educational process in higher school]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2016, vol. 4 (14), pp. 7–12 (in Russian).
12. Polyakova O. B. Osobennosti stressoustoychivosti budushchego pedagoga [Particularities of stress-resistance of a future teacher]. Mir psikhologii, 2008, no. 4, pp. 64–75 (in Russian).
13. Maslow A. G. Motivatsiya i lichnost’ [Motivation and personality]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 357 p. (in Russian).
14. Adair K. C., Heath A., Frye M. A., Frankel A., Proulx J., Rehder K. J., & Sexton J. B. The Psychological Safety Scale of the Safety, Communication, Operational, Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) Survey: a brief, diagnostic, and actionable metric for the ability to speak up in healthcare settings. Journal of patient safety, 2022, no. 18 (6), pp. 513–520.
15. Brown S. P., Leigh T. W. A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, no. 81, pp. 358–368.
16. Arguzumtsyan R. V., Muradyan E. B. Psikhologicheskiye aspekty bezopasnosti lichnosti [Psychological aspects of personal safety]. Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya – Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 2009, no. 1 (18), pp. 43–47 (in Russian).
17. Uvarov V. I. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ lichnosti: vliyaniye vneshnikh i vnutrennikh faktorov [Socio-psychological safety of personality: the influence of external and internal factors]. Sovremennaya psikhologiya: materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Modern Psychology: Proceedings of the V International Scientific Conference]. Kazan, Buk Publ., 2017. Pp. 19–25 (in Russian).
18. May D. R., Gilson R. L., Harter L. M. The psychology condition of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2004, no. 77, pp. 11–37.
19. Symanyuk E. E. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ obrazovatel’noy sredy [Psychological safety of the educational environment]. Moscow, 2004. 80 p. (in Russian).
20. Al’bukhanova K. A. O sub’’yekte psikhicheskoy deyatel’nosti: metodologicheskiye problemy psikhologii [About the subject of mental activity: methodol. problems of Psychology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 288 p. (in Russian).
21. Brushlinsky A. V. Problema sub’yekta v psikhologicheskoy nauke (stat’ya pervaya) [The problem of the subject in psychological science (article one)]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychology Journal, 1991, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 3–10 (in Russian).
22. Bezopasnaya obrazovatel’naya sreda: modelirovaniye i razvitiye: uchebnoye posobiye [Safe educational environment: study guide]. Ed. I. A. Baeva, S. V. Tarasov. Saint Petersburg, LOIRO Publ., 2017. 265 p. (in Russian).
23. McClintock A. H., Kim S., & Chung E. K. Bridging the gap between educator and learner: the role of psychological safety in medical education. Pediatrics, 2022, no. 149 (1), pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-055028
24. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 1999, no. 44 (2), pp. 350–383.
25. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Chelovek suverennyy: psikhologicheskoye issledovaniye sub’’yekta v yego bytii [The sovereign man: a psychological study of the subject in his being]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 400 p. (in Russian).
26. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Oprosnik “Suverennost’ psikhologicheskogo prostranstva” – novyy metod diagnostiki lichnosti [The questionnaire “Sovereignty of psychological space” The new method of the diagnostics of the personality]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2004, no. 25 (5), pp. 77–89 (in Russian).
27. Panyukova Yu. G. Empiricheskoye issledovaniye strukturnoy organizatsii psikhologicheskoy reprezentatsii prostranstvenno-predmetnoy sredy [Empirical studies of structural organization of psychological representation of spatially-subject environment]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya – Experimental psychology, 2009, no. 2 (3), pp. 111–122 (in Russian).
( 530.25 kB ) 
( 512.31 kB )
Issue: 5, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 143 — 153
Downloads: 101