Models of the Self in foreign psychology
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2024-4-111-123
The models of Self created in foreign psychology are considered. Their place is taken into account in broader theories to classify models of the Self. For this purpose, larger theories are divided into groups. They were separated and refined by psychodynamic, behavioral, cognitive, socio-psychological, narrative and existential-humanistic models of the Self. In psychodynamic models, the Self refers to the areas of consciousness and subconscious, considering them together. In this case, the Self differentiates and splits through divergence and fragmentation, or, conversely, deals with convergence and the emergence of a holistic Self. Behavioral patterns demonstrate a behavioral view of the Self. It included the Self as ongoing activity, including external behavior, verbal behavior and internal activity. Cognitive models refer to descriptions, prescriptions, and expectations about qualities and goals associated with a person’s sense of self. The cognitive self is a filter of incoming information. Social psychological models view the Self as subject and object, a relationship through which the Self is separated from itself. In narrative models, the Self concerns life stories that reconstruct the past and address the present and imagined future in unity. These are people’s stories about themselves. Existential-humanistic models deal with the Self, which tends to actualize itself. This leads to differentiation, symbolization and experience. A common feature of all models of the Self is their fragmentation. The prospect of their integration points to a hopeful future.
Keywords: foreign models of the Self, differentiation of the Self, psychodynamic Self, behavioral Self, cognitive Self, socio-psychological Self, narrative Self, existential-humanistic Self
References:
1. Aronova E. F., Morosanova V. I. Typologicheskaya struktura samosoznanya i samoregulyatsiya u starsheklassnikov [Typological structure of self-awareness and self-regulation among high school students]. Teoreticheskaya i experimentalnaya psykhologiya – Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 2008, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–44 (in Russian).
2. Gershkovich V. A., Falikman M. V. Kognitivnaya psykhologiya v poiskakh sebya [Cognitive psychology in search of itself]. Rossiiskyy zhurnal kognitivnoy nauki – The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science, 2018, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 28–46 (in Russian).
3. Dorfman L. Ya. Ya-kontseptsiya: differentsiatsiya i integratsiya [Self-concept: differentiation and integration]. Integtral’naya individual’nost’, Ya-kontseptisya, lichnost’ [Integral individuality, self-concept, personality]. Ed. L. Ya. Dorfman. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2004. Pp. 96–123 (in Russian).
4. Dorfman L. Ya., Kalugin A. Yu. Chetyrekhfaktornyy oprosnik Ya: ego kontseptual’nyy i psikhometricheskiy analiz [Four-Factor Self Questionnaire: Its Conceptual and Psychometric Analysis]. Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2020, vol. 75, pp. 53–74 (in Russian). URL: 10.17223/17267080/75/4 (accessed 17 June 2020).
5. Kon I. S. Otkrytiye Ya [Discovery of Self]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1978. 367 p. (in Russian).
6. Leontiev D. A. Ocherk psikhologii lichnosti [Essay on personality psychology]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 1997. 63 p. (in Russian).
7. Merlin V. S. Struktura lichnosti: Kharakter, sposobnosti, samosoznaniye [Personality structure. Character, abilities, self-awareness]. Perm, Perm State Pedagogical University Publ., 1990. 107 p. (in Russian).
8. Petrovskiy V. A. Konfiguratsiya artefakta [Artifact Configurations]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya – Cultural-historical Psychology, 2014, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 63–78 (in Russian).
9. Petrovskiy V. A. «Ya» v personalogicheskoy perspektive [Self in a personological perspective]. Moscow, NIU VShE Publ., 2013. 502 p. (in Russian).
10. Tkhostov A. Sh. Topologiya sub’’ekta (opyt fenomenologicheskogo issledovaniya) [Topology of the subject (the experience of phenomenological research)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psykhologiya, 1994, no. 2, pp. 3–13; no. 3, pp. 3–12 (in Russian).
11. Leary M. R., Tangney J. P. The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences. In: M. R. Leary, J. P. Tangney (Eds.) Handbook of self and identity. New York, London: The Guilford Press, 2003. Pр. 3–14.
12. Mischel W., Morf C. C. The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: A meta-perspective on a century of the self in psychology. In: M. R. Leary, J. P. Tangney (Eds.) Handbook of self and identity. New York, London: The Guilford Press, 2003. P. 15–43.
13. Bhar S. S., Kyrios M. The self-concept: theory and research. In: M. Kyrios, R. Moulding, G. Doron, S. S. Bhar, M. Nedeljkovic, M. Mikulincer (Eds.) The Self in understanding and treating psychological disorders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pр. 8–18.
14. Tesser A., Martin L. Cornell D. On the substitutability of self-protective mechanisms. In: P. M. Gollwitzer, J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking motivation and cognition to behavior. New York: Guilford, 1996. Pр. 48–68.
15. Freud Z. Psykhologiya bessoznatel’nogo [Psychology of the unconscious]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2007. 605 p. (in Russian).
16. Freud S. Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. London: Penguin Books, 1991. 557 p.
17. Mannoni O. Freud: The theory of the unconscious. London: Verso, 2015. 224 p.
18. Watson A. Who am I? The self/subject according to psychoanalytic theory. SAGE Open, 2014, vol. 4 (3), pp. 1–14. URL: 10.1177/2158244014545971 (accesed 15 January 2019).
19. Elliott A. Concepts of the Self (3 izd.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2013. 200 p.
20. Westen D. The cognitive self and the psychoanalytic self: Can we put our selves together? Psychological Inquiry, 1992, vol. 3 (1), pp. 1–13.
21. Yung K. G. Struktura i dinamika psykhicheskogo [Structure and dynamics of the mind]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2008. 478 p. (in Russian).
22. Klein M. Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. New York, NY: Dell Publishing Co., 1977. 365 p.
23. Kohut H. The restoration of the self. New York, NY: International Universities Press, 1977. 345 p.
24. Skinner B. F. About behaviorism. New York: Knopf, 1974. 304 p.
25. Hayes S. C., Barnes-Holmes D., Roche B. Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2001. 285 p.
26. Stewart I. A recent behaviour analytic approach to the self. European Journal of Behavioral Analysis, 2013, vol. 14, pp. 271–283.
27. Hayes S. C. Knowing selves. The Behaviour Therapist, 1995, vol. 18, pp. 94–96.
28. Skinner B. F. Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953. 461 p.
29. Epstein R. Skinner as self-manager. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1997, vol. 3, pp. 545–568. URL: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-545 (accessed 21 February 2023).
30. Malone J. C., Cruchon N. M. Radical Behaviotism and the rest of psychology: A review precis of Skinner’s about Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy, 2001, vol. 29, pp. 31–57.
31. Carver C. S., Scheier M. F. On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In: M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000. Pp. 41–84. URL: 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50032-9 (accessed 01 May 2023).
32. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton, 1967. 351 p.
33. Kihlstrom J. F., Beer J. S., Klein S. B. Self and identity as memory. In: M. R. Leary, J. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford Press, 2002. P. 68–90.
34. Aidman E., Carroll S. Implicit individual differences: Relationships between implicit self-esteem, gender identity and gender attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 2003, vol. 17, pp. 19–37.
35. Greenwald A. G., Banaji M., Rudnam L., Farnham S., Nosek B. A., Mellott D. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 2002, vol. 109, pp. 3–25.
36. Kihlstrom J. F., Mulvaney S., Tobias B. A., Tobis I. P. The emotional unconscious. In: E. Eich, J. F. Kihlstrom, G. H. Bower, J. P. Forgas, P. M. Niedenthal (Eds.), Cognition and emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pр. 30–86.
37. Barsade S. G., Ramarajan L., Westen D. Implicit affect in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2009, vol. 29, pp. 135–162.
38. Greenwald A. G., Banaji M. R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1995, vol. 102 (1), pp. 4–27.
39. Greenwald A. G., Farnham S. D. Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2000, vol. 79 (6), pp. 1022–1038.
40. Markus H. R., Wurf E. The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 1987, vol. 38, pp. 299–337.
41. Djeims Y. Printsipy psykhologii. Glava X. Soznaniye Ya [The principles of psychology. Chapter X. The consciousness of self]. In: Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. 2018. Vol. ХХ. Issue. 1-2. Pр. 24–48 (in Russian).
42. James W. The principles of psychology (V. 1). London: Macmilian, 1890/1902. 627 p.
43. Fiske S. Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 1991. 717 p.
44. Danziger K. The historical formation of selves. In: R. D. Ashmore, L. J. Jussim (Eds.), Rutgers series on self and social identity. V. 1. Self and identity: Fundamental issues. Oxford University Press, 1997. Pр. 137–159.
45. Marschall C. Kant’s metaphysics of the self. Philosothers’ Imprint, 2010, vol. 10, pp. 1–21.
46. Mead G. H. Mind, self, and society. Ed C. W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1934. 400 p.
47. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY.: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt, 1997. 604 p.
48. Bandura A. The evolution of social cognitive theory. In: K. G. Smith, M. A. Hitt (Eds.) Great minds in management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 9–35.
49. McAdams D. P., McLean K. C. Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2013, vol. 22(3), pp. 233–238. URL: 10.1177/0963721413475622 (accessed 20 February 2023).
50. Singer J. A. Narrative identity and meaning making across the adult lifespan: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 2004, vol. 72(3), pp. 437–460. URL: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00268.x (accesed February 2023).
51. McLean K. C., Pasupathi M., Pals J. L. Selves creating stories creating Selves: A process model of self-development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2007, vol. 11 (3), pp. 262–278. URL: 10.1177/1088868307301034 (accesed 18 September 2023).
52. Hermans H. J. M. Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 1996, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 31–50.
53. Hermans H. J. M., Hermans-Konopka A. Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 392 p.
54. Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2024. 470 p. (in Russian).
55. Rogers C. A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client–centered framework. In: Psychology: A Study of a Science. Vol. 3: Formulations of the Person and the Social Context. New York: McGraw Hill, 1959. 70 p.
56. Rogers C. On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1961. 422 p.
57. Rogers C. R. The emerging person: A new revolution. In: Carl Rogers: The man and his ideas. New York: Dutton, 1975. Pр. 147–175.
58. May R. (Ed.) Existential psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961. 117 p.
59. May R. The discovery of being: Writings in existential psychology. (Reprint). New York: W.W. Norton, 1994. 192 p.
60. Frick W. Subpersonalities: Who conducts the orchestra? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1993, vol. 33, pp. 122–128.
61. Bogart V. Transcending the dichotomy of either ‘subpersonalities’ or ‘an integrated unitary self’. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1994, vol. 34. 2, pp. 82–90.
( 401.78 kB ) 
( 392.21 kB )
Issue: 4, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 111 — 123
Downloads: 114