Formation of educational and business epistolographic tradition in native didactics in the second half of the 17th century
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2024-3-7-16
Bridging the chronological gap between the past and the present is an urgent condition for the process of didactic tradition of the new educational discipline «Russian Language and Business Communication.» At the same time, the correlation of the substantive and methodological content of this educational discipline with the historical and didactic continuity implies a direct appeal to the historical conditions that objectified genesis and the consolidation of the educational and business epistolographic tradition in domestic didactic practice. A comprehensive analysis of the situational changes caused in the second half of the 17th century by the beginning of the processes of forming a regular state, carried out within the framework of historical, anthropological and sociocognitive approaches, made it possible to distinguish a number of significant grounds that caused the appearance of handwritten alphabet copy-books with exemplary business letter-writers. The appearance and subsequent spread of this type of alphabet-books is a marker significant documentary fact of mental-cognitive recodification of public consciousness from the totality of sacred-religious meanings to the parallelism of divine providence and secular-business semantics, when reliance on divine justice was coupled with the need to follow within the given framework of administrative-bureaucratic accordance. The results achieved during the study make it possible to assert that the process of forming a domestic educational and business epistolographic tradition initially had a situationally objectified and autochthonously specified character, thereby defining its specific features, namely utilitarianism, prescriptivity and didactic pragmatism. At the same time, the very fact of the spread of the educational and business epistolographic tradition, which, in fact, was an option of the didactic mediation of the supra-chiefdom principle of the «sovereign» service, the practical grounds for positive inclusion in the unfolding processes of forming a regular state were set up.
Keywords: alphabet copy-books, exemplary business letter-writers, literacy training, prescriptiveepistological approach
References:
1. Bogoyavlenskiy S. K. Moskovskiy prikaznyy apparat i deloproizvodstvo XVI–XVII vekov [The Moscow order apparatus and office work of the XVI–XVII centuries]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2006. 608 p. (in Russian).
2. Marks N. A. Azbuka-propis’ vremen tsarya Mikhaila Feodorovicha [Alphabet alphabet from the times of Tsar Mikhail Feodorovich]. Moscow, Moskovskiy arkheologicheskiy institut Publ., 1911. 16 p. (in Russian).
3. Borisov V. A. Gramotnost’ shuyan v XVII i XVIII stoletii i svedeniya o nakhodivshikhsya v Shuye uchilishchakh [Literacy of the Shuya people in the XVII and XVIII centuries and information about the schools in Shuya]. Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya. Chast’ 84 [Journal of the Ministry of Public Education. Part 84]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya Imperatorskoy Akademii nauk Publ., 1854. Pp. 53–61 (in Russian).
4. Beseda trekh svyatiteley [Conversation of the three saints]. Pamyatniki starinnoy russkoy literatury [Monuments of ancient Russian literature]. Saint Petersburg, 1862. V. 3. Pp. 169–178 (in Russian).
5. Mordovtsev D. L. O russkikh shkol’nykh knigakh XVII veka [About Russian school books of the XVII century]. Moscow, Tipografiya Moskovskogo imperatorskogo universiteta Publ., 1862. 102 p. (in Russian).
6. Demkov M. I. Istoriya russkoy pedagogii. V 2 chastyakh. Chast’ I [History of Russian Pedagogy. In 2 parts. Part 1]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha Publ., 1899. 310 p. (in Russian).
7. Miropol’skiy S. I. Ocherk istorii tserkovno-prikhodskoy shkoly [Sketch of the History of the Parochial Church School]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya Glazunova Publ., 1919. 222 p. (in Russian).
8. Polotskiy S. Obed dushevnyy [Lunch of the soul]. Moscow, Verkhnyaya Publ., 1681. 771 l. (in Russian).
9. Ninivita I. D. Commetarii grammatiki. Parisiis. Ed: Officiana R. Stephani. 1537. 766 p.
10. Kurbanov A. V., Spiridonova L. V. Neopublikovannoye rukovodstvo brat’yev Likhudov po epistolografii [Unpublished manual of the Likhud brothers on epistolography]. Vizantiyskoye sodruzhestvo: traditsii i smena paradigm: tezisy dokladov XXII Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy sessii vizantinistov [Byzantine Commonwealth: traditions and paradigm shift: theses of reports of the 22nd All-Russian Scientific Session of Byzantinists]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State University Publ., 2019. Pp. 92–93 (in Russian).
11. Yalamas D. A. Znacheniye deyatel’nosti brat’yev Likhudov v svete grecheskikh, latinskikh i slavyanskikh rukopisey i dokumentov iz rossiyskikh i evropeyskikh sobraniy. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [The Significance of the Likhud Brothers’ Activities in a view of Greek, Latin and Slavonic Manuscripts and Documents from Russian and European Collections. Abstract of thesis dis. doc. ped. sci.]. Moscow, 2001. 60 p. (in Russian).
12. Levshin D. M. Pazheskiy Yego Imperatorskogo velichestva korpus za sto let [His Imperial Majesty’s Pages Corps for One Hundred Years]. Saint Petersburg, Tovarishhestvo khudozhestvennoy pechati Publ., 1902. 720 p. (in Russian).
13. Kachalov N. V. Azbuki-propisi (vypiski iz rukopisnykh azbuk i propisey kontsa XVII v. i nachala XVIII v.) [ABCsprescriptions (extracts from alphabet manuscripts and ABCs-prescriptions of the end of the 17th century and the beginning of the 18th century)]. Arkhiv istoriko-yuridicheskikh svedeniy, otnosyashchikhsya do Rossii [Archive of historical and legal information relating to Russia]. 1861. Kn. III. Otd. 3. Pp. 3–18 (in Russian).
14. Preobrazhenskiy V. A. Azbuka, ili propisi dlya chistopisaniya v kontse XVII v. Yur’ya Danilova syna Eremeeva [Alphabet, or penmanship ABCs-prescriptions by Yury Danilov son of Yeremeev at the end of the 17th century]. Vremennik Moskovskogo obshchestva istorii i drevnostey rossiyskikh [Temporary journal of the Moscow Society of History and Russian Antiquities]. 1854. Kn. 20. Pp. 30–32 (in Russian).
Issue: 3, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: GENERAL PEDAGOGY, HISTORY OF PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION
Pages: 7 — 16
Downloads: 150