Thinking and art: the conjugation of anthropological practices
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2024-2-149-158
The scientific discourse of modern post-non-classical psychology is characterized by overcoming monodisciplinary language in describing the multidimensional phenomenology of human existence and those practices through which a person constitutes his subjectivity and reproduces a meaningful, human way of life. Such anthropological practices include thinking and art, which make it possible to continuously complete and transform the picture of the world (both at the level of the individual and at the level of social consciousness). A work of art, from the position of the author of the work, is not only a means of aesthetic transformation of reality, but also a symbolic expression of life itself, concentrated and aesthetically loaded with the thought of her. Reflecting on the aesthetic and conceptual aspects of a work of art, a person receives unique opportunities: to reveal the meaning of non-obvious sign-symbolic correspondences between the events of his own life and their artistic equivalents; productively rethink the individual way of being, overcome the inertia of everyday rationality. The article reveals and receives theoretical justification for the functional connection, phenomenological proximity, and mutual reversibility of thinking and art. In both practices, a certain unity of affect and intellect, concept and metaphor, fantasy and common sense is revealed. Thinking is an internal moment of any artistic creation, but it, in turn, receives an intentional impulse from the same noetic, motivational sources as art. The similarity of the dynamics of mental search (especially its first phases) with the dynamics of the artistic act is shown, as well as the inclusion of specific emotional states in both processes. An integral link between the mental and artistic act is imagination, the main function of which here is to defamiliarize things and undermine established ways of constructing meaning. The author, using the example of the relationship between the central and implicit parts of scientific theory, reveals the phenomenology of the “breakthrough” of human creative thought beyond the boundaries of routine mental activity. This effect is a consequence of the repeated collision of established methods of conceptualization with fantasy anomalies that the imagination produces, thereby opening up an alternative search for eidetic and symbolic solutions.
Keywords: thinking, thought, mental search, art, artistic act, imagination, meaning
References:
1. Vygotskiy L. S. Psikhologiya iskusstva [Psychology of art]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1987. 341 p. (in Russian).
2. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1979. 424 p. (in Russian).
3. Dil’tey V. Opisatel’naya psikhologiya [Descriptive psychology]. Saint Petersburg, Aleteyya Publ., 1996. 160 p. (in Russian).
4. Haydegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? [What is called thinking?]. Moscow, Territoriya budushchego Publ., 2006. 320 p. (in Russian).
5. Propp V. Ya. Morfologiya “volshebnoy” skazki. Istoricheskiye korni volshebnoy skazki [Morphology of a “magic” fairy tale. Historical roots of fairy tales]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 1998. 512 p. (in Russian).
6. Hillman Dzh. Vnutrenniy poisk [Internal search]. Moscow, Kogito-Centr Publ., 2004 (in Russian). URL: https://predanie.ru/book/209163-vnutrenniy-poisk/ (accessed 5 September 2023).
7. Mamardashvili M. K. Neobhodimost’ sebya [Necessity of self]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 1996. 432 p. (in Russian).
8. Rozin V. M. Tri kontseptsii psikhologii iskusstva (sootnosheniye psikhologicheskogo, iskusstvovedcheskogo i filosofskogo diskursov) [Three concepts of the psychology of art (the relationship between psychological, art history and philosophical discourses]. Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – National psychological journal, 2023, vol. 3, pp. 6–15 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2023.0302
9. Losev A. F. Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul’tura [Philosophy. Mythology. Culture]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1991. 525 p. (in Russian).
10. Zinchenko V. P. Psikhologicheskiye aspekty vliyaniya iskusstva na cheloveka [Psychological aspects of the influence of art on a person]. Kul’turno-istoricheskayа psikhologiya – Cultural-historical psychology, 2006, vol. 2. (4), pp. 3–21 (in Russian).
11. Shpet G. G. Vnutrennyaya forma slova: etyudy i variatsii na temy Gumbol’ta [Internal form of the word: studies and variations on a theme by Humboldt]. Ivanovo, Ivanovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 1999. 304 р. (in Russian).
12. Bibler V. S. Myshleniye kak tvorchestvo [Thinking as creativity]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1975. 399 р. (in Russian).
13. Van Gog V. Pis’ma [Letters]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1966. 604 р. (in Russian).
14. Kandinskiy V. O dukhovnom v iskusstve [About the spiritual in art]. Saint Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 2020. 288 р. (in Russian).
15. Vygotskiy L. S. Sobraniye sochineniy. T. 2. Problemy obshchey psikhologii [Collected works. Vol. 2. Problems of general psychology]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1982. 504 р. (in Russian).
16. Ukhtomskiy A. A. Dominanta [Dominant]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2019. 512 р. (in Russian).
17. Mamardashvili M. K. Besedy o myshlenii [Conversations about thinking]. Moscow, Fond Meraba Mamardashvili Publ., 2015. 816 р. (in Russian).
18. Moren E. Metod. Priroda Prirody [Method. The nature of nature]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2005. 464 р. (in Russian).
19. Polani M. Lichnostnoye znaniye [Personal knowledge]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985. 344 р. (in Russian).
20. Florenskiy P. A. Sochineniya [Essays]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2000. Vol. 3 (1). 621 р. (in Russian).
( 397.99 kB ) 
( 389.26 kB )
Issue: 2, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 149 — 158
Downloads: 220