Quality of life plans in late adolescence
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2023-6-164-171
The issues of formation of life plans of students staying in late adolescence are considered. The main idea of the study was that the key abilities of life planning are of ageless significance. The purpose of the empirical study was to identify and evaluate the quality of students’ life plans and the possibility of using the planning skills acquired in youth in old age. To do this, it was necessary to identify what elements of planning can and should be mastered in adolescence, so that they allow them to adapt to life after the end of their working career and ensure life satisfaction in old age. The study involved 80 students of Bunin Yelets State University. The experiment and the method of expert assessments were used as research methods. The experts were non-working pensioners aged 65 to 74 years. It was found that the current life plans of students are sketchy, unsystematic and monotonous. In this version, they cannot provide effective preparation for life at other ages. Experts, based on their own life experience, taking into account the mistakes of planning their own life in late adolescence, identified six positions by which it is necessary both to assess the quality of planning life schedules and to specifically form them. It is these positions that were poorly represented or not presented at all in the plans-reports of students. In particular, this is the structuring of personal time; special individual habits; family responsibilities; organization of communication with friends; key events of the week and month; contribution to the organization of their personal space. It is noted that one of the tools for preparing for life in late ontogenesis can be mentoring on the issues of planning one’s life.
Keywords: life planning, life strategies, personality of an elderly person, old age, late youth
References:
1. Demina I. A. Psikhologicheskiye osobennosti planirovaniya budushchego v vozraste ranney yunosti [Psychological features of planning the future at the age of early youth]. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Proceedings of the Altai State University, 2000, no. 2 (16), pp. 18–22 (in Russian).
2. Molodezh’ novoy Rossii: obraz zhizni i tsennostnyye prioritety [Youth of new Russia: lifestyle and value priorities] (in Russian). URL: https://www.isras.ru/analytical_report_Youth.html (accessed 25 February 2023).
3. Kurysheva O. V. Vozrastnyye kharakteristiki strukturirovaniya zhiznennogo puti [Age characteristics of life path structuring]. Vestnik universiteta – Bulletin of the University, 2014, no. 12, pp. 274–279 (in Russian).
4. Anderson L. B., Gettings P. E. “Old age scares me”: Exploring young adults’ feelings about aging before and during COVID-19. Journal of Aging Studies, 2022, no. 1 (60), 100998. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2022.100998. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406522000019 (accessed 25 February 2023).
5. Shilova N. P. Formirovaniye vremennoy perspektivy sovremennykh yunoshey i devushek [Formation of the time perspective of modern boys and girls]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya – Theoretical and experimental psychology, 2022, no. 3, pp. 34–43 (in Russian).
6. Amani J., Luvanga B., Kihaga H., Ndeskoi T., Gabriel L. Why do academics fail to plan for retirement? Employers’ and employees’ views. Journal of Aging Studies, 2023, vol. 64, March. 101103. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089040652300004X (accessed 25 February 2023).
7. Orlovic M., Warraich H., Wolf D., Mossialos E. End-of-Life Planning Depends on Socio-Economic and Racial Background: Evidence from the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2021, vol. 62, is. 6, December, pp. 1198–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.05.018
8. Macmillan R., Eliason S. R. Characterizing the life course as role configurations and pathways: A latent structure approach. Handbook of the life course, 2003, pp. 529–554. doi: 10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_24
9. Smith F., Dougherty D. Revealing a Master Narrative: Discourses of Retirement Throughout the Working Life Cycle. Management Communication Quarterly, 2012, vol. 26, is. 3, pp. 453–478. doi: 10.1177/0893318912438687
10. Chase C., Eklund S., Pearson L. Affective responses of faculty emeriti to retirement. Educational Gerontology, 2003, vol. 23, December, pp. 521–534. doi: 10.1080/713844397
11. Steiner J., Amabile T. What do I make of the rest of my life? Global and quotidian life construal across the retirement transition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2022, vol. 171, July, 104137. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104137. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597822000218 (accessed 25 February 2023).
12. Barrett A. E., Barbee H. The subjective life course framework: Integrating life course sociology with gerontological perspectives on subjective aging. Advances in Life Course Research, 2022, vol. 51, March, 100448. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2021.100448. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040260821000526 (accessed 25 February 2023).
13. Arnett J. Conceptions of the transition to adulthood from adolescence through midlife. Journal of Adult Development, 2001, vol. 8 (2), pp. 133–143. doi: 10.1023/A:1026450103225
14. Andreyeva A. D., Lisichkina A. G., Brimova L. A. Vremennaya i zhiznennaya perspektiva kak motivatsionnyy tsentr samoopredeleniya v ranney yunosti: sravnitel’no-istoricheskoye issledovaniye [Temporal and life perspective as a motivational center of self-determination in early youth: a comparative historical study]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya – Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 2022, no. 3, pp. 198–210 (in Russian).
15. Karabanova O. A., Zakharova E. I., Starostina Yu. A. Lichnostnyye faktory postroyeniya professional’noy kar’yery v period vkhozhdeniya vo vzroslost’ [Personal factors in building a professional career during the period of entry into adulthood]. Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – National Psychological Journal, 2020, no. 4 (40), pp. 113–124 (in Russian).
16. Neyaskina Yu. Yu., Mazurkevich A. V. Vzaimosvyaz’ sub’’ektivnogo kachestva zhizni i vremennoy perspektivy lichnosti [Relationship between subjective quality of life and personal temporal perspective]. Vestnik Kraunts. Gumanitarnyye nauki, 2014, no. 1, pp. 94–105 (in Russian).
17. Leontiyev D. A. Smysloobrazovaniye i yego konteksty: zhizn’, struktura, kul’tura, opyt [Meaning formation and its contexts: life, structure, culture, experience]. Mir psikhologii, no. 1, pp. 104–117 (in Russian).
18. Budyakova T. P., Baturkina G. V., Nizhnik G. N. Fizicheskaya kul’tura i sport kak prediktory antiviktimnoy lichnosti [Physical culture and sports as predictors of anti-victim personality]. Yelets, YEGU im. I. A. Bunina Publ., 2023. 160 p. (in Russian).
19. Pazukhina S. V., Dekina E. V. Psikhologicheskiye indikatory udovletvorennosti studentov vzaimodeystviyem s kuratorami novogo tipa – nastavnikami [Psychological indicators of student satisfaction with interaction with curators of a new type – mentors]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2023, vol. 1 (47), pp. 158–169 (in Russian). doi: 10.23951/2307-6127-2023-1-158-169.
( 371.07 kB ) 
( 363.55 kB )
Issue: 6, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 164 — 171
Downloads: 246