Types of subjective riskogenicity of students in the context of psychological resilience to the sociocultural risks of the educational environment
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2023-4-153-161
The relevance of the study is related to the increasing cases of various destructions in the interaction between students (bullying, cyberbullying, addictive behavior, armed attacks), which are considered as variants of students’ maladjustment as a result of deep sociocultural transformations in society. The purpose of the study is to present the author’s classification of the types of subjective riskiness of students based on the analysis of their psychological resistance to the socio-cultural risks of the educational environment of the school and to describe them in the context of personal characteristics. The study sample consisted of 3232 students of secondary schools of the Republic of Tatarstan aged 12 to 16 years. Students who voluntarily agreed to take part in the study filled out in writing a bound questionnaire, which included the author’s methodology “Index of socio-cultural safety of a schoolchild” and “R. Cattell’s 14-factor personality questionnaire”. The study was conducted anonymously, the respondents were required to indicate their age and gender. Statistical research methods are cluster analysis, comparative analysis (Student’s t-test), descriptive statistics. The subjective riskogenicity of students is considered from the standpoint of the problems of psychological resistance to the sociocultural risks of the educational environment, which determine the complexity of interaction in the “subject-contextual” system of the educational environment. The author’s typology of subjective riskiness of students is presented: vulnerable type, disintegrated type, maladaptive type, autistic type, adaptive type. The specifics of students’ personal characteristics are described depending on the type of their subjective riskiness. Conclusions: the hypothesis was confirmed that students with problems of psychological stability, constituting a certain type of riskiness (autistic type, disintegrated type, maladaptive type, vulnerable type), in contrast to the adaptive type, have characteristic personality traits that cause the complexity of interaction in the “subjectively -contextual” system of the educational environment. The maladaptive type is distinguished by impatience and the desire to dominate. The disintegrated type characterizes social courage and reduced sensitivity to threats. The vulnerable type is characterized by depression, anxiety, sensitivity to acceptance in the reference group, increased frustration, and the autistic type of students is characterized by reduced responsibility, determination and self-control. Practical application of the results. Identification of the type of subjective riskiness of students opens up the possibility for the individualization of the educational process and the implementation of timely preventive measures to prevent the socio-psychological maladjustment of children and adolescents.
Keywords: safety of educational environment, sociocultural risks, type of subjective riskiness, socio-psychological vulnerability, socio-psychological disintegration, virtual autism
References:
1. Soldatova G. U., Rasskazova Ye. I. Neosvedomlennost’ roditeley o stolknovenii podrostkov s riskami v internete: soderzhaniye i psikhologicheskiye faktory [Parental ignorance about adolescents’ exposure to risks on the Internet: content and psychological factors]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2019, no. 1 (40). pp. 71–83 (in Russian).
2. Tarasov A. N., Katayev D. V. Riski tsifrovizatsii obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva shkoly v usloviyakh sovremennoy sotsiokul’turnoy transformatsii [Risks of digitalization of the educational space of the school in the conditions of modern socio-cultural transformation]. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly), 2020, no. 6, pp. 7–12 (in Russian).
3. Sobkin V. S., Kalashnikova Ye. A. K voprosu o mezhpokolencheskikh razlichiyakh v sotsial’nom samochuvstvii podrostkov: zhiznennaya pozitsiya i otsenka znachimosti ugroz [On the issue of intergenerational differences in the social well-being of adolescents: life position and assessment of the significance of threats]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2021, no. 3 (26), pp. 54–69 (in Russian).
4. Skobel’tsina K. N., Kuznetsov A. N., Beshenkov C. A. Kak rossiyskiye shkol’niki protivostoyat kiberugrozam? [How do Russian schoolchildren resist cyber threats?]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2021, no. 4 (26), pp. 43–53 (in Russian).
5. Sobkin V. S., Lykova T. A. Rasprostranennost’ tatuirovok sredi uchashchikhsya obshcheobrazovatel’nykh shkol: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskiye aspekty [The prevalence of tattoos among students of secondary schools: sociopsychological aspects]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2021, no. 5 (26), pp. 101–115 (in Russian).
6. Beck A. Transcultural Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Anxiety and Depression: A Practical Guide. London, Routledge Publ., 2016. 196 p.
7. Lazarus R. S. Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York, NY, US: Springer Publishing Co, 1999. Pp. 56–68.
8. Thomas W., Kenneth Kilmann R. Thomas-Kilmann conflict MODE instrument. 1976. https:doi.org/10.1037/t02326-000
9. PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life Means for Students’ Lives, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2019. https:doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en
10. Sanchez I. M, Martinez R. G., Gonzalez D. G, Rodriguez J. A. School Bullying in Compulsory and Advanced Secondary Education. Determining Factors in its Intervention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, no.16 (5), P. 750.
11. Prygin G. S. Sub’’yektnaya real’nost’ kak novaya paradigma psikhologii [Subjective reality as a new paradigm of psychology]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya Seriya: Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya – Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2019, no. 3 (31), pp. 217–228 (in Russian).
12. Khusainova S. V. Issledovaniye lichnostno-sotsial’noy ustoychivosti uchashcheysya molodezhi v sovremennykh realiyakh [Study of the personal and social stability of student youth in modern realities]. KPZH – Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2017, no. 5 (124), pp. 106–111 (in Russian).
13. Rubtsova O. V., Panfilova A. S., Smirnova V. K. Issledovaniye vzaimosvyazi lichnostnykh osobennostey podrostkov s ikh povedeniyem v virtual’nom prostranstve (na primere sotsial’noy seti «VKontakte») [Study of the relationship between personality characteristics of adolescents and their behavior in the virtual space (on the example of the VKontakte social network)]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2018, no. 3 (23), pp. 54–66 (in Russian).
14. Sobkin V. S., Fedotova A. V. Podrostkovaya agressiya v sotsial’nykh setyakh: vospriyatiye i lichnyy opyt [Teenage aggression in social networks: perception and personal experience]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2019, no. 2 (24), pp. 5–18 (in Russian).
15. Vardanyan B. Kh. Mekhanizmy regulyatsii emotsional’noy ustoychivosti. Kategorii, printsipy i metody psikhologii. Psikhicheskiye protsessy [Mechanisms of regulation of emotional stability. Categories, principles and methods of psychology. Mental processes]. Moscow, 1983, pp. 542–543 (in Russian).
16. Chistopol’skaya K. A., Kolachev N. I., Yenikolopov S. N., Nikolayev Ye. L., Drovosekov S. E. Suitsidal’nost’ i chuvstvo avtorstva sobstvennoy zhizni: oprosnik M. Linekhan «Prichiny dlya zhizni» [Suicidality and a sense of authorship of one’s own life: M. Linehan’s “Reasons for Life” questionnaire]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye - Psychological Science and Education, 2022, no. 2 (27), pp. 65–88. doi: 10.17759/pse.2022270306 (in Russian).
17. Kholmogorova A. B., Kazarinova Ye. Yu., Rakhmanina A. A. Pozitsiya obuchayushchikhsya v uchebnoy deyatel’nosti i predpochitayemyy imi kontent v internete kak faktory problemnogo ispol’zovaniya prostranstva Vsemirnoy seti [The position of students in educational activities and their preferred content on the Internet as factors in the problematic use of the World Wide Web space]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2022, no. 3 (27), pp. 104–116 (in Russian).
18. Joseph S, Linley P. A. Growth following adversity: theoretical perspective and implications for clinical practice. Clin Psychol Rev., 2006, no. 26 (8), pp. 1041–1053.
19. Khusainova S. V., Matveyeva L. V., Ermilova L. P., Yakushevskaya K. N., Kolomiychenko L. V., Mashkin N. A. Adaptive model of psychological and pedagogical support of professional training of students. Revista ESPACIOS, 2018, no. 5 (39), P. 22.
20. Kislyakov P. A., Shmeleva E. A. Analysis of Russians’ Views on Personal Qualities as a Basis for Prosocial Safe Behavior Factors’ Identification. The Open Psychology Journal, 2020, no. 13, pp. 40–48.
21. Anikina V. G. Refleksiya i virtual’naya real’nost’: ot etimologicheskogo analiza ponyatiy k ponimaniyu sushchnostnykh otnosheniy [Reflection and virtual reality: from etymological analysis of concepts to understanding essential relations]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2021, no. 1 (26), pp. 19–26 (in Russian).
22. Mil’charek T. P. Nonkommunikativnost’ v modeli kompleksnoy diagnostiki psikhologicheskikh priznakov ekstremizma i problema sokhraneniya sotsial’nogo zdorov’ya molodezhi [Non-communicativeness in the model of complex diagnostics of psychological signs of extremism and the problem of maintaining the social health of youth]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Psikhologiya» – Herald of Omsk State University. Series “Psychology”, 2016, no. 4, pp. 33–41 (in Russian).
23. Rubtsova O. V., Poskakalova T. A., Shiryayeva Ye. I. Osobennosti povedeniya v virtual’noy srede podrostkov s raznym urovnem sformirovannosti «obraza Ya» [Peculiarities of Behavior in the Virtual Environment of Adolescents with Different Levels of “I-Image” Formation]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2021, no. 4 (26), pp. 20–33 (in Russian).
24. Rubtsova O. V., Panfilova A. S., Artemenkov S. L. Issledovaniye vzaimosvyazi lichnostnykh osobennostey igrokov podrostkovogo i yunosheskogo vozrasta s ikh povedeniyem v virtual’nom prostranstve (na primere gruppovoy komp’yuternoy igry «Dota 2») [Study of the relationship between the personal characteristics of adolescent and youth players and their behavior in the virtual space (on the example of the group computer game “Dota 2”)]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2018, no. (1) 23, pp. 137–148 (in Russian).
25. Bovina I. B., Dvoryanchikov N. V. Povedeniye onlayn i oflayn: dve real’nosti ili odna? [Behavior online and offline: two realities or one?]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2020, no. 3 (25), pp. 101–115 (in Russian).
26. Gilemkhanova E. N. Metodika «Indeks sotsiokul’turnoy bezopasnosti shkol’nika» [Technique “Adolescence Socio-Cultural Safety Index”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya – The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology, 2019, no. 2, pp. 164–183 (in Russian).
27. Batarshev A. V. Diagnostika pogranichnykh psikhicheskikh rasstroystv lichnosti i povedeniya [Diagnosis of borderline mental disorders of personality and behavior]. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Psikhoterapii Publ., 2004. 320 p. (in Russian).
( 437.37 kB ) 
( 427.38 kB )
Issue: 4, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 153 — 161
Downloads: 231