STUDYING THE INTERRELATION OF HARDINESS AND COPING STRATEGIES IN STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT AGES DURING THE PANDEMIC PERIOD
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2022-3-168-175
The current state of the problem of developing the resilience of the individual at the stage of mastering the future profession is relevant for optimizing and increasing the effectiveness of the process of education and upbringing in higher education. The level of resilience of young people is closely related to the nature of the course of the adaptation process, including the formation of coping behavior skills. The purpose of the study: to test and substantiate the existence of a relationship between resilience and coping behavior strategies among students of different ages. The study of the relationship between resilience and coping behavior strategies among students of different ages was conducted on a sample of students from the Tula State Pedagogical University. L.N. Tolstoy at the age of 18 to 24, in the amount of 67 people. S. Muddy’s hardiness test and Lazarus’ Methods of Coping Behavior Questionnaire (WSQ) were used as diagnostic material. Statistical data processing was carried out using SPSS Statistics 27 (IBM). The study showed that resilience is a dynamic process, due to the age-psychological characteristics of the individual and the experience of overcoming life’s difficulties. This is evidenced by differences in the structure of hardiness in different age groups, as well as an increase in the level of hardiness from youth to youth.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, resilience, coping strategies, students
References:
1. Chertovikova A. S. Psikhotravmiruyushchiye faktory v usloviyakh izolyatsii [Psychotraumatic factors in isolation]. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya – Problems of modern pedagogical education, 2018, no. 60 (1), pp. 485–489 (in Russian).
2. Quansah F., Hagan J.E., Sambah F., et al. Perceived Safety of Learning Environment and Associated Anxiety Factors during COVID-19 in Ghana: Evidence from Physical Education Practical Oriented Program. European Journal of Investigation in Health. Psychology and Education, 2022, vol. 12(1), pp. 28–41. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12010003/
3. Petrova E. A., Nazarenko V. V. Vyrazhennost’ situativnoy i lichnostnoy trevozhnosti u studentov vuza s OVZ i invalidnost’yu v period pandemii [The Severity of Situational and Personal Anxiety Among University Students With Disabilities During the Pandemic]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya – Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2021, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 48–61. doi: 10.17759/cpp.2021290203 (in Russian).
4. Makarova E. Yu., Tsvetkova N. A. Psikhologicheskiye osobennosti reaktsii na stress, obuslovlennyy rezhimom samoizolyatsii v period pandemii COVID-19 [Psychological features of reactions to stress caused by the regime of self-isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic]. E-Scio, 2020, no. 10 (49), pp. 145–157 (in Russian).
5. Almondes K. Md., Bizarro L., Miyazaki M. C. O. S. et al. Comparative Analysis of Psychology Responding to COVID-19 Pandemic in Brics Nations. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, vol. 12, pp. 567–585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567585
6. Nash C. Limitations on Doodling as a Measure of Burnout. European Journal of Investigation in Health. Psychology and Education, 2021, vol. 11, pp. 1688–1705. doi: 10.3390/ ejihpe11040118
7. López-Valenciano A., Suárez-Iglesias D. et al. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on University Students’ Physical Activity Levels: An Early Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, vol. 11, pp. 624–567. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.624567
8. Martínez-Líbano J., Yeomans M.-M., Oyanedel J.-C. Psychometric Properties of the Emotional Exhaustion Scale (ECE) in Chilean Higher Education Students. European Journal of Investigation in Health. Psychology and Education, 2022, vol. 12, pp. 50–60. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12010005
9. Leontiyev D. A., Rasskazova E. I. Zhiznestoikost’ kak sostavlyayushchaya lichnostnogo potentsiala / Lichnostnyy potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Resilience as a component of personal potential / Personal Potential: Structure and Diagnosis]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2011. 680 p. (in Russian).
10. Klimov A. A. Zhiznestoikost’ i eye vzaimosvyaz’ s lichnostnymi tsennostyami studentov [Resilience and its Relationship to Personal Values of Students]. Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya «Psikhologiya» – Bulletin of Samara Humanitarian Academy. Psychology Series, 2011, no. 2 (10), pp. 14–23 (in Russian).
11. Loginova M. V. Zhiznestoikost’ kak vnutrenniy klyuchevoy resurs lichnosti [Resilience as an internal key resource of personality]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii – Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2009, no. 6, pp. 19–22 (in Russian).
12. Fominova A. N. Razvitiye zhiznestoikosti uchashchegosya v shkole [Developing student resilience in school]. Moscow, Sentyabr’ Publ., 2014. 160 p. (in Russian).
13. Friesen M. A. Zhiznestoykost’ kak vnutrenniy resurs professional’noy deyatel’nosti pedagoga [Resilience as an internal resource of teacher’s professional activity]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya – Organizational Psychology, 2018, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 72–85 (in Russian)
14. Lazarus R., Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer, 1984.
15. Karapetyan L. V., Glotova G. A. Psikhologicheskiye determinanty emotsional’no-lichnostnogo blagopoluchiya trudyashchikhsya [Psychological determinants of emotional and personal well-being of workers]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya = Organizational psychology, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 8–23 (in Russian).
16. Leontiyev D. A., Rasskazova E. I. Test zhiznestoykosti [Test of Resilience]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2006. 63 p. (in Russian).
17. Kryukova T. L., Kuftyak E. V. Oprosnik sposobov sovladaniya (adaptatsiya metodiki WCQ) [Questionnaire of coping methods (adaptation of WCQ technique)]. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa – Journal of Practical Psychologist, 2007, no. 3, pp. 93–112 (in Russian).
18. Tsypin A. P., Sorokin A. S. Zhiznestoikost’ kak vnutrennii resurs professional’noi deyatel’nosti pedagoga [Statistical software packages in socio-economic research]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: ekonomika i upravleniye – Azimut Scientific Research: Economics and Management, 2016, vol. 5, no. 4 (17), pp. 379–384 (in Russian).
19. Nalivayko T. V. K voprosu osmysleniya kontseptsii zhiznestoykosti S. Maddi [To the Question of Understanding S. Muddy’s Concept of Resilience]. Vestnik integrativnoy psikhologii – Bulletin of Integrative Psychology, 2006, no. 4, pp. 45–54 (in Russian).
20. Valenti G. D., Faraci P. Predicting University Adjustment from Coping-Styles, Self-Esteem, Self-Efficacy, and Personality: Findings from a Survey in a Sample of Italian Students. European Journal of Investigation in Health. Psychology and Education, 2021, vol. 11, pp. 894–907. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11030066
( 482.38 kB ) 
( 464.08 kB )
Issue: 3, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 168 — 175
Downloads: 536