APPLICATION OF GAME THEORY AGAINST NATURE TO CHOOSE A LEARNING STRATEGY
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2022-2-32-39
The problem of choosing a teaching strategy depending on a heterogeneous contingent of students is considered. It is assumed that one of the following strategies can be used: passive, active or interactive learning. The listed strategies can be combined for a specific group of students, but they cannot be applied individually to each individual student. It is necessary to choose the optimal strategy for a specific contingent of students in order to achieve the best learning outcomes. The model of the educational process is mathematically formalized in terms of theory of game against nature. Four categories of students are introduced, correlated with different strategies (states) of «nature». Students can be characterized not only by the presence of abilities, but also by the level of motivation, and the probabilistic distribution of students by these characteristics can be known (stochastic uncertainty) or unknown. In the conditions of stochastic uncertainty, the criteria for choosing the optimal strategy can be the criteria of the maximum average gain or the minimum average risk. Decision-making in the absence of information about the probability distribution of strategies of nature can be based on the criteria of Wald, Savage, Hurwitz. The same game matrix was used for the calculations, but with different assumptions about the distribution of students by type and with different decision-making criteria. The described approaches allow us to take the choice of a learning strategy with greater responsibility for its results. Practice shows the positive impact of such an analysis on the effectiveness of training.
Keywords: teaching methods, games with nature, game matrix, stochastic uncertainty, decisionmaking criteria
References:
1. Selevko G. K. Sovremennye obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii [Modern educational technologies]. Moscow, Narodnoye obrazovaniye Publ., 1998. 256 p. (in Russian).
2. Zagvyazinsky V. I. Teoriya obucheniya: Sovremennaya interpretatsiya [Teaching theory: Modern interpretation]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2006. 192 p. (in Russian).
3. McManus D. The Two Paradigms of Education and the Peer Review of Teaching. Journal of Geoscience Education, 2001, vol. 49, no. 6, pр. 423–434.
4. Silberman M. Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach Any Subject. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publ., 1996. 189 p.
5. Hmelo-Silver C. E. Problem-based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 2004, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–266.
6. Zimina O. V. Problemnoye obucheniye vysshey matematike v tekhnicheskikh vuzakh [The Problem-Oriented Mathematical Education in Technical Universities]. Matematika v vysshem obrazovanii – Mathematics in Higher Education, 2006, no. 4, pp. 55–78 (in Russian).
7. Gefan G. D. Problemnoye obucheniye matematike studentov nematematicheskikh spetsial’nostey i napravleniy podgotovki vysshego obrazovaniya [The problem-oriented mathematical teaching to students of non-mathematical specialties and areas of preparation of higher education]. Matematika v vysshem obrazovanii – Mathematics in Higher Education, 2015, no. 13, pp. 51–64 (in Russian).
8. Gefan G. D., Kuzmin O. V. Aktivnoye primeneniye komp’yuternykh tekhnologiy v prepodavanii veroyatnostnostatisticheskikh distsiplin v tekhnicheskom vuze [Active Use of Computer Technology in Teaching Probabilistic and Statistical Disciplines in Technical University]. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. P. Astaf’eva – Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev, 2014, no. 1 (27), pp. 57–61 (in Russian).
9. Gefan G. D. Kontseptsiya teoretiko-empiricheskogo dualizma v obuchenii matematike [The Concept of Theoretical-Empirical Dualism in Teaching Math]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2020, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 85–95 (in Russian).
10. Garris R., Ahlers R., Driskell J. E. Games, Motivation, and Learning: a Research and Practice Model. Simulation Gaming, 2002, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 441–467.
11. Sakharova O. N. Metodika organizatsii delovykh igr po matematike [Methodology for Organizing Business Games in Mathematics]. Vestnik vysshey shkoly – Bulletin of Higher Education, 2008, no. 7, pp. 38–44 (in Russian).
12. Burguillo J. C. Using Game Theory and Competition-based Learning to Stimulate Student Motivation and Performance. Computers & Education, 2010, vol. 55, pp. 566–575.
13. Sukhanov M. B. Delovye igry s matematicheskim modelirovaniem kak sredstvo formirovaniya professional’noy kompetentnosti studentov ekonomicheskogo profilya [Business Games with Mathematical Modelling as a Means for Development of Professional Competence of Economics Students]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical University, 2012, no. 152, pp. 195–202 (in Russian).
14. Cagiltay N., Ozcelik E., Ozcelik N. S. The Effect of Competition on Learning in Games. Computers & Education, 2015, vol. 87, pp. 35–41.
15. Gefan G. D. Obucheniye matematicheskoy teorii igr s primeneniyem igrovykh i komp’yuternykh tekhnologiy [Teaching the Mathematical Theory of Games with the Use of Game and Computer Technologies]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Informatika i informatizatsiya obrazovaniya – Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series: Informatics and Informatization of Education, 2017, no. 2 (40), pp. 26–33 (in Russian).
16. Gefan G. D. Matematicheskiye boi kak chast’ uchebnogo protsessa v vuze (na primere prepodavaniya teorii veroyatnostej) [Mathematical fights as part of the educational process in the university (teaching of probability theory as example)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, vol. 7 (160), pp. 96–101 (in Russian).
17. Ventsel’ E. S. Issledovaniye operatsiy. Zadachi, printsipy, metodologiya [Operations research. Objectives, principles, methodology]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2001. 208 p. (in Russian).
18. Papadimitriou C. H. Games against nature. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1985, vol. 31, рp. 288–301.
19. Gefan G. D. Elementy teorii igr: uchebnoye posobiye [Elements of game theory: a tutorial]. Irkutsk, IrGUPS Publ., 2011. 55 p. (in Russian).
( 455.54 kB ) 
( 446.22 kB )
Issue: 2, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: GENERAL EDUCATION
Pages: 32 — 39
Downloads: 481