THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTENT OF RESILIENCE AND PROTECTIVE MECHANISMS IN PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT KINDS OF INTERNET-BEHAVIOR
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2021-6-199-209
The article is devoted to the study of specificity of a resilience and psychological defense mechanisms in young people with different levels of Internet addiction. It presents modern views on the content of such concepts as “resilience”, “psychological defense mechanisms”, “Internet addiction”. Also, it includes the results of pilot study, which was conducted on a sample of 51 NSTU students, aged 19 to 21 years. The Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS), the test “Adult Resilience” by A. V. Makhnach, a questionnaire of the structure of psychological defenses M. Bond were used in the study. It was found that psychological defenses in general are more pronounced in the group with Internet-addictive behavior, and resilience is more expressed in the group with minimal risk of Internet-addictive behavior. Internet-addictive behavior, maladaptive psychological defenses such as passive aggression, behavioral response, hypochondria, fantasy, and adaptive defense – prediction are more often used. The results let authors conclude that resilient youth is characterized, on the one hand, by the use of defenses that worsen their interaction with other people, polar thinking both in relation to themselves and in relation to other people, on the other hand, and by the striving for people and the use of humor and creativity in difficult situations.
Keywords: Internet-addiction, internet addicted behavior, cybersocialization, resilience, psychological defense mechanisms, personal defense mechanisms
References:
1. Pleshakov V. A. Kibersotsializatsiya cheloveka: ot homo Sapiens’a do Homo Cyberus’a [Cybersocialization of the person: from homo Sapiens to Homo Cyberus]. Moscow, Prometey Publ., 2012. 45 p. (in Russian).
2. Kozlova N. S. Vliyaniye internet-sredy na lichnost’ i eye zhiznedeyatel’nost’ [The influence of the Internet environment on the person and her life]. Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye – Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2015, no. 3, pp. 274–285 (in Russian).
3. Laktionova A. I. Vzaimosvyaz’ zhiznesposobnosti i sotsial’noy adaptatsii podrostkov. Avtoref. dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Correlation between resilience and social adaptation of adolescents. Abstract of thesis cand. psychol. sci.]. Moscow, 2010. 29 p. (in Russian).
4. Grant L., Kinman G. Enhancing wellbeing in social work students: building resilience in the next generation. Social work education. The international journal, 2012, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 605–621. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232870527_Enhancing_Wellbeing_in_Social_Work_Students_Building_Resilience_in_the_Next_Generation (accessed 25 August 2021). doi: 10.1080/02615479.2011.590931
5. Liu L. et al. Disease activity, resilience and healthrelated quality of life in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multi-center, cross-sectional study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2017, no. 15. URL: https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12955-017-0725-6 (accessed 26 August 2021). doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0725-6
6. Southwick S. M. et al. Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. European journal of Psychotraumatology, 2014, vol. 5, no. 1, 15 p. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338 (accessed 24 July 2021). doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338
7. Lapkina E. V. Sovladayushcheye povedeniye, zhiznestoykost’ i zhiznesposobnost’ lichnosti: svyaz’ ponyatiy, funktsii [Coping behavior, hardiness and resilience of the individual: the relationship of concepts, functions]. Vestnik KGU im. N. A. Nekrasova – Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2015, vol. 21, pp. 130–133 (in Russian).
8. Kuftyak E. V. Adaptatsiya oprosnika issledovaniya faktorov zhiznesposobnosti [Adaptation of the resilience’s factors research questionnaire]. Vestnik KGU im. N. A. Nekrasova – Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2016, no. 4, pp. 128–132 (in Russian).
9. Toledano-Toledano F. et al. Validity and reliability of the Mexican resilience measurement scale in families of children with chronic conditions. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2017, no. 4. URL: https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12955-017-0817-3 (accessed 28 July 2021). doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0817-3
10. Johnston M. C. et al. Physical disease and resilient outcomes: a systematic review of resilience definitions and study methods. Psychosomatics, 2015, no. 56 (2), pp. 168–180. URL: https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/physical-disease-and-resilient-outcomes-a-systematic-review-of-re (accessed 25 August 2021). doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2014.10.005
11. Merino M. D., Privado J. Positive Psychological Functioning. Evidence for a new construct and its measurement. Anales de psicología, 2015, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 45–54. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication281980118_Positive_Psychological_Functioning_Evidence_for_a_new_construct_and_its_measurement (accessed 24 August2021). doi: 10.6018/analesps.31.1.171081
12. Borisov G. I., Pecherkina A. A. Zhiznesposobnost’ kak usloviye professional’nogo razvitiya lichnosti [Resilience as a condition of professional development of a person]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2015, no. 11, pp. 72–75 (in Russian).
13. Rusyayeva I. A. Filosofskiye aspekty Ya-kontseptsii: korni psikhologicheskikh zashchit [Philosophical aspects of Self-concept: roots of psychological defenses]. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem – Modern Studies of Social Issues, 2012, no. 11 (19) (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/filosofskie-aspekty-yakontseptsii-korni-psihologicheskih-zaschit (accessed 14 May 2021).
14. Koteneva A. V. Zashchitnye mekhanizmy lichnosti i emotsional’naya sfera [Defence mechanisms of personality and emotional sphere]. Vestnik TGU – Tomsk State University Journal, 2008, no. 9 (65), pp. 270–276 (in Russian).
15. Burns R. Chto takoye Ya-kontseptsiya (ch. 3/3) [What is the Self-concept (part 3/3)] (in Russian). URL: http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bits/burns3.htm (accessed 3 July 2021).
16. Arzumanyan S. S. Formirovaniye Ya-kontseptsii kak problema pedagogicheskoy psikhologii [Construction of Self-concept as a problem of pedagogical psychology]. Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovanii, 2012, no. 4, pp. 99–105 (in Russian).
17. Krystal H., Krystal J. Integration and self-healing. Affect – Trauma – Alexithymia. The Analytic Press, 1988. 800 p. (Rus. ed.: Kristal G., Kristal Kh. Integratsiya i samoistseleniye. Affekt – Travma – Aleksitimiya. Moscow, Institute of General humanitarian research Publ., 2006. 800 p.)
18. Kruzhkova O. V. Psikhologicheskaya zashchita i sovladaniye: fenomenologicheskoye sootnosheniye i struktura [Psychological defense and coping: phenomenological relation and structure]. Vestnik LGU im. A. S. Pushkina – Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal, 2012, no. 1, pp. 36–47 (in Russian).
19. Bogdanova M. V. Zashchitnaya funktsiya depersonalizatsii v sisteme zhizneobespecheniya lichnosti [Protective function of depersonalization in the life support system of the person]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tyumen State University Herald, 2012, no. 9, pp. 169–174 (in Russian).
20. Paatova M. E. Teoreticheskiye osnovy formirovaniya sotsial’no-lichnostnoi zhiznesposobnosti podrostkov s deviantnym (obshchestvenno opasnym) povedeniyem v usloviyakh uchrezhdenii zakrytogo tipa [Theoretical framework of the formation of social and personal resilience of adolescents with deviant (socially dangerous) behavior in closed institutions]. Vestnik Maykopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 2016, no. 4, pp. 57–63 (in Russian).
21. Chereneva E. A. Zashchitnye mekhanizmy povedeniya kak faktor adaptivnogo povedeniya lichnosti [Protective mechanisms of behavior as a factor of adaptive behavior of the person]. VVestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 6 (134), pp. 122–126 (in Russian).
22. Belinskaya E. P. Psikhologiya internet-kommunikatsii [Psychology of Internet communication]. Moscow, MPSU Publ.; Voronezh, MODEK Publ., 2013. 192 p. (in Russian).
23. Voyskunskiy A. E. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya fenomena internet-addiktsii [Psychological study of the phenomenon of Internet addiction]. 2-aya Rossiiskaya konferentsiya po ekologicheskoy psikhologii. Tezisy [the 2nd Russian conference on ecological psychology. Theses]. Moscow, Ekopsitsentr ROSS Publ., 2000. Pp. 251–253 (in Russian).
24. Voyskunskiy A. E. Zavisimost’ ot Interneta: aktual’naya problema [Internet addiction: an actual problem]. Konferentsiya na portale «Auditorium». «Sotsial’nye i psikhologicheskiye posledstviya primeneniya informatsionnykh tekhnologii» [Conference on the portal «auditorium». «Social and psychological consequences of the use of information technologies»]. 2001 (in Russian). URL: http://banderus2.narod.ru/80266.html (accessed 2 June 2021).
25. Malygin V. L. et al. Internet-zavisimoye povedeniye. Kriterii i metody diagnostiki [Internet-addicted behavior: criteria and diagnostic methods]. Moscow, MGMSU Publ., 2011. 32 p. (in Russian).
26. Tunik E. E. Psikhologicheskiye zashchity. Testovaya metodika [Psychological defenses. Test method]. Saint-Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2010. 219 p. (in Russian).
( 419.49 kB ) 
( 408.89 kB )
Issue: 6, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 199 — 209
Downloads: 599