FEATURES OF THE EDUCATIONAL INFLUENCE OF THE FATHER AND MOTHER ON THE FORMATION OF LIFE GUIDELINES OF CHILDREN
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-3-191-200
In recent decades, the Russian family has undergone profound changes in relations between generations of parents and children. There is a practice-justified view that Russian children were never as different from parents by their mentality as in today’s reality. The retrospective analysis carried out in the article of the family’s performance of its educational function with regard to children differentiated by sex shows the importance and place of each parent in the formation of the child’s personality. The conducted survey of schoolchildren in five regions of Russia (2019) and comparison of its results with the data of a similar survey of ten years ago (2009) make it possible to draw conclusions about trends in family education, as well as about which parents most successfully perform their educational role in the modern Russian family. In retrospect of the last ten years, alarming conclusions are being formulated about the reduction of parents’ authority as advisers. In the dynamics of these years there is a decrease in the attitude of children to be similar to their parents. Attention is drawn to the fact that most children do not view the family environment as comfortable for cohabitation with parents, which indicates the factors of disadvantage of these families. The desire of children to assert their financial independence by independently earning money for pocket expenses has been revealed. There is an increase in the number of children evading the answer about the sources of money, which may indicate improper practices in obtaining it. The given data of the comparative study make it possible to conclude that there has been an increase in certain deformation of parental roles in the family over the past ten years. The task of the family today is to contribute to the formation of life guidelines of children, offering them reliable starting conditions for achieving success. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the analysis of the influence of educational actions (omissions) of each parent on the formation of immunity in children from possible external negative influences taking into account modern social risks in society.
Keywords: father, mother, family, children, parenting, trends in family education
References:
1. Connel R. W. Gender and Power: Society, the Personality and Sexual Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press (Rus. ed.: Konnel P. Gender i vlast’: obshchestvo, lichnost’ i gendernaya politika. Moscow, Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2015. 432 p.).
2. Parsons T. The Social System (Rus. ed.: Parsons T. O sotsial’nykh sistemakh. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2002. 448 p.).
3. Adler A. The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology (Rus. ed.: Praktika i teoriya individual’noy psikhologii. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2007. 232 p.).
4. Adler A. Vospitaniye detey. Vzaimodeystviye polov [Parenting. Gender interaction]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ.,1998. 412 p. (in Russian).
5. Fromm E. To Have оr to Be? Moscow, AST Publ., 2000. 368 p.
6. Zagvyazinskiy V. I., Chekhonin A. D. Vospitatel’nyy potentsial ottsovstva: kontseptual’nye osnovaniya issledovaniya i podderzhki [The educational potential of paternity: a conceptual framework for research and support]. Obrazovaniye i nauka – The Education and Science Journal, 2017, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 106–127 (in Russian).
7. Burns R. B. Self-Concept Development and Education (Rus. ed.: Berns R. Razvitiye Yа-kontseptsii i vospitaniye. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986. 422 p.).
8. Erikson E. Childhood and society (Rus. ed.: Erikson E. Detstvo i obshchestvo. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2019. 416 p.).
9. Moskal M. Polish Migrants In Scotland: Emotional Geographies And Family Well-Being In Transnational Spaces. In: ESA 10th Conference “Social Relations in Turbulent Times”, Geneva, 7–10 September 2011. Abstract Book. Social Problem. New York, Basic Books, 2011. 328 p.
10. Blankenhorn D. Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem. New York, Basic Books, 2011. 328 p.
11. Bloss T. La dialectique des rapports homes-femmes. Presses Univ. de France, 2001. 285 p.
12. Mid M. O vospitanii detey v sem’e [About raising children in the family]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 429 p. (in Russian).
13. Young M., Wilmott P. The Symmetrical Family: A Study of Work and Leisure in the London Region. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973. 398 p.
14. Tartakovskaya I. N. Gendernaya sotsiologiya [Gender sociology]. Moscow, Variant Publ., 2005. 368 p. (in Russian).
15. Karabanova O. A. Psikhologiya semeynykh otnosheniy: uchebnoye posobiye [Psychology of family relations: study guide]. Samara, SIOKPP Publ., 2001.122 p. (in Russian).
16. Mayorova-Shcheglova S. N. Sotsial’nye faktory, vliyayushchiye na destruktivnost’ detsko-roditel’skikh otnosheniy v sovremennykh sem’yakh s podrostkami [Social factors affecting the destructiveness of parent-child relationships in modern families with adolescents]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial’nye nauki – Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 2018, no. 4 (52), pp. 55–61 (in Russian).
( 419.63 kB ) 
( 408.76 kB )
Issue: 3, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 191 — 200
Downloads: 755