PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR FORMING MENTAL HEALTH OF STUDENTS BY MEANS OF VIDEO
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2018-1-85-91
Questions of preservation and strengthening of psychological health of students are considered. The influence of methods of pedagogy on the psychological state of students is determined. The choice of teaching methods depends on the psychological state of the student and the social climate of the class. The system-activity approach to the design of teaching methods using the video method was used. The following theoretical methods were used: the study and analysis of special psychopedagogical and scientific-methodological research; analysis of educational and methodological documentation, general theoretical methods of analysis, synthesis, theoretical modeling. The functions of test control are detailed: didactic, educational, diagnostic and preventive, corrective and their influence on the psychological state of students. The didactic function of the video method is directly related to the principle of visibility. Educational function of the video method is that with the help of this technology to create psychological and pedagogical conditions for the formation of socially positive behavior. The corrective function is aimed at minimizing the risks associated with improper use of the video method. The diagnostic and prophylactic function of using the video method consists in the possibility of recording phenomena and processes that are important from the point of view of analyzing the psychological state of participants in educational relations. Psychological and pedagogical conditions for the formation of psychological health of students using a video method are revealed.
Keywords: video method, didactic function, educational function, correction function, diagnostic-preventive function
References:
1. Psikhologicheskiy institut Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya [Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education] (in Russian). URL: http://pirao.ru (accessed 25 June 2017).
2. Podlasyy I. P. Teoriya i tekhnologii obucheniya [Theory and techniques of teaching]. Moscow, 2007. 578 p. (in Russian).
3. Shalygina I. V. Mozhno li sdelat’ pravil’nyy uchebnyy videokeys svoimi rukami? [Is it possible to make a proper educational video case with your own hands?]. Sovet rektorov, 2012, no. 2, pp. 20–33 (in Russian).
4. Ardaiz-Villanueva O., Nicuesa-Chacón X., Brene-Artazcoz O., Acedo Lizarraga M. L. S., Acedo Baquedano M. T. S. Evaluation of computer tools for the idea of generation and team formation in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 2011, no. 56 (3), pp. 700–711. DOI: 10.1016 / j.compedu.2010.10.012.
5. Polat E. S., Moiseeva M. V., Petrov A. I. Pedagogicheskiye tekhnologii distantsionnogo obucheniya [Pedagogical techniques of distance learning]. Moscow, 2006. 400 p. (in Russian).
6. Alieva M. K., Vezirov T. G. Informatsionno-kommunikatsionnaya obrazovatel’naya sreda kak sredstvo formirovaniya gotovnosti budushchikh bakalavrov po profi lyu “yurisprudentsiya” k proyektnoy deyatel’nosti [Information and communication educational environment as a means of forming the readiness of future bachelors in the fi eld of “jurisprudence” for project activities]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya – World of Science, Culture, Education, 2014, no. 6 (49), pp. 107–108 (in Russian).
7. Tan A. L., Towndrow P. A. Catalyzing student-teacher interactions and teacher teaching in science practice formative assessment with digital video technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2011, no. 25 (1), pp. 61–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.007.
8. Shimov I. V. Primeneniye robototekhnicheskikh ustroystv v obuchenii programmirovaniyu [Application of robotic devices in teaching students programming]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2013, no. 1, pp. 185–188 (in Russian).
9. Juklová K. Innovations in the Practical Training for the Future Czech Teachers from the Perspective of their Educators. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, no. 171, pp. 526–534. DOI: 10.1016 / j.sbspro.2015.01.157Get rights and content.
10. Kubiatko M., Haláková Z. Slovak high school students’ attitudes to ICT using in biology lesson. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, no. 25 (3), pp. 743–748. DOI: 10.1016 / j.chb.2009.02.002.
11. Komenskiy Ya. A., Lokk D., Russo Zh.-Zh., Pestalotstsi I. G. Pedagogicheskoye naslediye [Pedagogical heritage]. Moscow, 1989. 416 p. (in Russian).
12. Gordievskikh V. M., Petukhov D. V. Tekhnicheskiye sredstva obucheniya [Technical means of teaching]. Shadrinsk, 2006. 152 p. (in Russian).
13. Utkina O. N. Kompetentsii samokorrektsii pedagogicheskoy tekhniki pedagoga [Competence of self-correction of pedagogical receptions of a teacher]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern problems of science and education, 2014, no. 3 (in Russian). URL: http://www.science-education.ru/en/article/view?id=13402 (accessed 25 June 2017).
14. Utkina O. N., Miroshnichenko A. A. Pantomimika pedagoga: kinematicheskiy aspekt [Pantomime of the teacher: kinematic aspect]. Vestnik IzhGTU im. M. T. Kalashnikova – Bulletin of Kalashnikov ISTU, 2011, no. 2, pp. 216–219 (in Russian).
15. Utkina O. N., Miroshnichenko A. A. Svobodnoye programmnoye obespecheniye v protsesse formirovaniya pedagogicheskoy tekhniki [Free software in a process of developing of pedagogic techniques]. Distantsionnoye i virtual’noye obucheniye – Distance and Virtual Learning, 2012, no. 3, pp. 107–116 (in Russian).
( 420.58 kB ) 
( 413.72 kB )
Issue: 1, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ISSUES OF PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 85 — 91
Downloads: 981