Search
Warning: Undefined array key "6042/" in /web/zanos/classes/Edit/EditForm_class.php on line 263
Warning: Undefined array key "6042/" in /web/zanos/classes/Player/SearchArticle_class.php on line 261
Warning: Undefined array key "6042/" in /web/zanos/classes/Player/SearchArticle_class.php on line 261
# | Search | Downloads | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | This article is devoted to a generalized description and comparison of the development of pedagogical education in China and Russia. The main stages of the development of pedagogical education in China include: the birth and formation at the end of the Qing dynasty (1897−1911); development and streamlining in the period of the Republic of China (1912−1948); restructuring and transformation after the creation of the People’s Republic of China (1949 − to the present). The main stages of the development of pedagogical education in Russia include: the birth and formation in the period of Tsarist Russia (1779−1917); development and normalization in the period of the USSR (1918−1991); transformation and modernization in the period of the Russian Federation (1991 − up to the present). The difference in the specifics of the development of pedagogical education of two countries is seen at the stage of the state of origin, the fundamentals of development. The history of the development of pedagogical education in Russia is longer than in China. Its foundation was greatly influenced by religious foundations. Chin ese pedagogical education was created on the basis of the political goal of the state, although it was based on the ideas of Confucianism. The formation and development of Russian pedagogical education was due to the internal needs of the state, social demand. Chinese pedagogical education originated in the context of the national crisis, it was a necessary measure to preserve the integrity, strengthen the country. The policy has had a greater influence on the reform of pedagogical education in China than the development of pedagogical science. In the pedagogical education of Russia, the achievements of peda gogical science were more taken into account. Similarities are more evident at the level of contemporary tendencies in the development of pedagogical education, such as universitization, continuity, and openness. Keywords: professional pedagogical education, stages of development of pedagogical education, pedagogical education in Russia, pedagogical education in China | 1199 | ||||
2 | As we enter the new millennium, the emerging reforms in the fields of secondary education and teachers’ education in China have raised new demands on the quality of teachers’ training. Professional-methodical training as an integral part of teachers’ education is closely related to the quality of teachers’ training. In order to improve the effectiveness of teachers’ training, this article examines and analyzes the history of development and the current state of professional-methodical training of teachers in China. Studies show that the development of this training is characterized by a late start, a short period of development, folding under the influence of Western countries, and in the context of educational reform, it faces enormous challenges, as well as new opportunities. The main characteristics of the current state of professional-methodical teachers’ training in China include: “blind” copying and borrowing the experience and models of professional-methodical training of other countries, while reforming teacher’ education, where national conditions and needs of general education are increasingly taken into account; the complexity of the system of professional-methodical teachers’ training, where the central place is occupied by the academic discipline “teaching methods”; practical orientation of professional-methodical training. And on the basis of the results of the study, constructive proposals are put forward for the further development and improvement of this training. To improve the system of professional-methodical training, it is necessary to reform it in three ways: to clarify the goals; improve educational programs; diversify assessment methods. Keywords: professional-methodical training, methodical training system, teachers’ training in China, history of professional-methodical training in China, the state of professional-methodical training in China | 763 |