Personal and emotional-volitional components as determinants of the decision-making process
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2023-2-113-121
Introduction. The relevance of the study of the peculiarities of decision-making and manifestation in this process of individual psychological features of personality is indicated. In the study of decisionmaking of specialists and managers, there were high scores on the scales of “Vigilance” and “Hupervigilance”, as well as the use of such a mechanism of psychological protection as “Intellectualization”, which indicates an increased awareness of the consequences in the choice of the decision, the tendency to apply productive behavioral strategies (constructive coping); in decision-making they rely on reason rather than intuitive thinking; when a problem situation arises, they seek certainty in position. In a separate group of specialists and managers, the traits of “over-vigilance” were identified that prevent the process of orientation in a problem situation, because of which the individual uses spontaneous and chaotic behavior and may make mistakes in choosing possible options for action. When studying the decision-making of performers, high scores were noted on the scales “Avoidance” and “Procrastination”, as well as the use of such a psychological defense mechanism as “Denial”, which indicates that when problem situations arise, they tend to use coping strategies, aimed at avoiding difficulties or “postponing” important matters for the following days, which is also expressed in the transfer of responsibility to other people and life circumstances, speaking of bad luck or prejudice on the part of the management team; insufficient assessment of the circumstances, avoidance of difficulties and responsibility, which is also confirmed by the results of the questionnaire aimed at making decisions. Features of decision-making are of interest for further study by modern psychological science, due to the fact that they manifest the individual psychological characteristics of a particular person and the effectiveness of its activities in the production process and other aspects of functioning, including human behavior in a stressful situation.
Keywords: features of decision-making, constructive and destructive behavior, psychological defense mechanisms
References:
1. Epishin V. E. Strategii kontrolya neopredelennosti pri reshenii prognosticheskikh zadach [Uncertainty Control Strategies in Solving Forecast Problems]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya, 2021, no. 1, pp. 80–94 (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45747170 (accessed 25 July 2022).
2. Vasil’ev I. A. Rol’ intellektual’nykh emotsiy v regulyatsii myslitel’noy deyatel’nosti [The role of intellectual emotions in the regulation of mental activity]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 1998, no. 4, pp. 49–60 (in Russian). URL: https://istina.msu.ru/publications/article/9116714/ (accessed 26 July 2022).
3. King R. B., dela Rosa E. D. Are your emotions under your control or not? Implicit theories of emotion predict well-being via cognitive reappraisal. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019, no. 138, pp. 177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.040
4. Hughes J. S. Support for the domain specificity of implicit beliefs about persons, intelligence, and morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, no. 86, pp. 195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.042
5. Tseptsov V. A. Psikhologicheskiye determinanty peregovorov: individual’nye osobennosti tselepolaganiya [Psychological determinants of negotiations: individual features of goal setting]. Obshcheniye i poznaniye [Communication and knowledge]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2007. P. 274–299 (in Russian). URL: https://ipran.ru/profile/цепцов-василий-александрович/ (accessed 30 July 2022).
6. Asmolov A. G., Shexter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. Preadaptatsiya k neopredelennosti kak strategiya navigatsii razvivayushchikhsya sistem: marshruty evolyutsii [Preadaptation to Uncertainty as a Navigation Strategy for Developing Systems: Routes of Evolution]. Vosposy psikhologii – Voprosy Psychologii, 2017, no. 4, pp. 3–26 (in Russian). URL: https://publications.hse.ru/articles/240628915 (accessed 18 July 2022).
7. Grant A. M. Rethinking psychological mindedness: Metacognition, self reflection, and insight. Behaviour Change, 2001, no. 1, pp. 8–17. doi: 10.1375/bech.18.1.8
8. Valueva E. A., Ushakov D. V. Empiricheskaya verifikatsiya modeli sootnosheniya predmetnykh i e’motsional’nykh sposobnostey [Empirical Verification of the Model of Correlation of Objective and Emotional Abilities]. Psikhologiya – Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2010, no. 2, pp. 103–114 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/empiricheskaya-verifikatsiya-modeli-sootnosheniya-predmetnyh-i-emotsionalnyh-sposobnostey (accessed 20 July 2022).
9. Feist G. J., Barron F. X. Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of research in personality, 2003, no. 2, pp. 62–88. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00536-6
10. Derevyanko S. P., Andreyeva I. N., Primak Yu. V. Vzaimosvyaz’ mezhdu uverennost’yu v sebe i emotsional’noy kreativnost’yu u lits s raznoy siblingovoy positsii [The relationship between self-confidence and emotional creativity in individuals with different sibling positions]. Balkanskoye nauchnoye obozreniye, 2020, no. 3 (9), pp. 37–41 (in Russian). doi: 10.34671/SCH.BSR.2020.0403.0022
11. Ivannikov V. A. Psikhologicheskiye mekhanizmy volevoy regulyatsii [Psychological mechanisms of volitional regulation]. Moscow, Piter Publ., 2006. 203 p. (in Russian).
12. Dunn J. R., Schweitzer M. E. Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2005, no. 5, pp. 736–748. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736
13. Zinchenko V. P. Tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti: novost’ ili psikhologicheskaya traditsiya [Uncertainty tolerance: news or psychological tradition]. Chelovek v situatsii neopredelennosti [Man in a situation of uncertainty]. 2007. P. 9–33 (in Russian). URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/686/941/1224/зин3.pdf (accessed 26 July 2022).
14. Cudeck R., Browne M. W. Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research,1983, no. 2, pp. 147–167. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1802_2
15. Verbitskiy A. A. Novaya obrazovatel’naya paradigma i kontekstnoye obucheniye [New educational paradigm and contextual learning]. Moscow, Research Center for Quality Problems in Specialist Training Publ., 1999, 75 p. (in Russian).
16. Kamenev I. I., Kornilova T. V., Razvalyaeva A. Yu. Svyazi riska pri prinyatii resheniy s motivatsiey i samoregulyatsiey (na vyborke meditsinskikh rabotnikov) [Links between risk in decision-making and motivation and selfregulation (on a sample of medical workers)]. Voprosy psikhologii – Voprosy Psychologii, 2018, no. 1, pp. 127–137 (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32751777 (accessed 26 July 2022).
17. Karpov A. V. Metodologicheskiye aspekty eksperimental’nogo issledovaniya protsessov prinyatiya resheniya [Methodological aspects of the experimental study of decision-making processes]. Sovremennaya eksperimental’naya psikhologiya. Institut psikhologii RAN, 2011, no. 1, pp. 89–114 (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26219235 (accessed 28 July 2022).
18. Civai C., Hawes D. R. Game theory in neuroeconomics. Neuroeconomics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2016, pp. 13–37. URL: https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/871x2 (accessed 04 August 2022).
19. Achar C., So J., Agrawal N., Duhachek A. What we feel and why we buy: the influence of emotions on consumer decision-making. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2016, no. 10, pp. 166–170. doi: 10.1016/ j.copsyc.2016.01.009
20. Averill J. R. A tale of two snarks: Emotional intelligence and emotional creativity compared. Psychological Inquiry, 2004, no. 3, pp. 228–233. URL: https://people.umass.edu/jra/studiesofemotion/articles/creativity/TwoSnarks.pdf (accessed 02 August 2022).
21. Barchard K. A., Brackett M. A., Mestre J. M. Taking stock and moving forward: 25 years of emotional intelligence research. Emotion Review, 2016, no. 4, pp. 289–289. doi: 10.1177/1754073916650562
22. Bar-On R. The Bar-On model of emotional intelligence: A valid, robust and applicable EI model. Organisations and People, 2007, no. 2, pp. 27–34. URL: https://hr-portal.ru/varticle/model-socialnogo-i-emocionalnogo-intellekta-ruvena-bar-ona-esi (accessed 29 August 2022).
23. Pavlova E. M., Kornilova T. V. Triada “tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti – emotsional’nyy intellekt – intuitivnyy stil’” i samootsenka kreativnosti u lits tvorcheskikh professiy [The triad “tolerance to uncertainty-emotional intelligence-intuitive style” and self-assessment of creativity in people of creative professions]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye issledovaniya, 2011, no. 1, pp. 107–117 (in Russian). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/psyedu/archive/2019_n1/Pavlova_Kornilova (accessed 29 August 2022).
( 709.56 kB ) 
( 696.04 kB )
Issue: 2, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 113 — 121
Downloads: 298