EDUCATIONAL URBAN STUDIES: APPROACH TO DESCRIBING KEY CONCEPTS
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2021-6-236-245
The notions “urban environment”, “urban object”, “urban resource” are traditionally discussed by such sciences as urban studies, economics, sociology and others, but the development of new directions in education also includes them in pedagogical research, in particular in the field of educational urban studies. There is a need to identify opportunities to consider these concepts in terms of their educational potential and to determine their place in modern education. To do this, let us review the sources and formulate approaches to the definition of key terms of educational urban studies. The concept “environment” is usually defined in two ways – as a set of physical conditions and as a human environment. Interpreting this approach in an educational context, the second meaning can be interpreted as a set of citizens’ activity practices, including educational ones. The urban educational environment is a system of three levels: macro-level, mesolevel and micro-level. The meso- and micro-levels are the most interesting for the study of educational potential. In urban planning, urban objects as elements of the urban environment are classified by function, affiliation, and operator. These features determine the programmability of the object in terms of its educational potential for citizens. An urban object becomes educational only if a citizen endows it with educational value, using it for their formal, non-formal, and informal educational practices. Educational resourcefulness is determined not only by resources of the object itself, but also by resources of a person using it. Educators possessing the competences of an urban teacher can become guides to discovering educational resourcefulness of a city and organizers of urban educational practices. The notions of an urban educational object, which becomes such when a city resident uses its educational potential, and the urban educational practice as a formula connecting an urban object, educational needs of a city resident, methods of using the educational potential of an urban object and direct educational activity in the interaction with the object were defined. Based on these formulations, we can begin to develop approaches to the inclusion of urban environment in the educational process, including an assessment of the educational potential of the urban environment.
Keywords: urban environment, urban object, urban resource, urban educational environment, urban educational opportunities, urban educational resource, urban educational practice
References:
1. Reznikova K. V. Russian Urban Environment Research Review. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2018, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1467–1486.
2. Polyakova T., Tsurik T. Urban environment quality and its impact on socio-economic development. Economic Annals-XXI, 2019, vol. 180, no. 11–12, pp. 155–164.
3. Bol’shoy tolkovy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Large explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Ed. S. A. Kuznetsov. Saint Petersburg, Norint Publ., 1998. 664 p. (in Russian).
4. Glazychev V. L. Sotsial’no-ekologicheskaya interpretatsiya gorodskoy sredy [Social and Eco-logical Interpretation of Urban Environment]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984. 180 p. (in Russian). URL: http://www.glazychev.ru/books/soc_ecolog/soc_ecolog_vvedenie.htm (accessed 28 July 2021).
5. Porozov R. Y. Kul’turno-obrazovatel’noye prostranstvo goroda [Cultural and educational space of the city]. Yekaterinburg, 2012. 174 p. (in Russian).
6. Bekarev A. M. Svoboda cheloveka v sotsial’nom prostranstve. Dis. dokt. filos. nauk [Human freedom in social space. Dis. doc. of philos. sci.]. Ekaterinburg, 1993. 389 p. (in Russian).
7. Glazychev V. L. Urbanizm [Urbanism]. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2008. 220 p. (in Russian).
8. Kolomna: gorod-muzey [Kolomna: city-museum] (in Russian). URL: https://mk.mosreg.ru/sobytiya/novostiministerstva/17-01-2018-11-17-41-kolomna-gorod-muzey (accessed 1 July 2021).
9. Dyba E. A. Kak universitet uluchshayet gorodskuyu sredu [How the University Improves the Urban Environment] (in Russian). URL: https://iq.hse.ru/news/186814654.htm (accessed 1 July 2021).
10. Sayt «Komfortnaya gorodskaya sreda i ZhKKh» [Site “Comfortable Urban Environment and Housing and Communal Services”] (in Russian). URL: https://gorodsreda.ru/ (accessed 12 June 2021).
11. Sergeyeva O. E., Lazareva E. N. Komfortnaya gorodskaya sreda kak opredelyayuschiy faktor razvitiya megapolisov [Comfortable Urban Environment as a Determinant Factor in Megapolis Development]. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye – Administrative Consulting, 2018, no. 11, pp. 166–173 (in Russian).
12. Tarasova L. G. Informatsionnaya osnova prinyatiya gradostroitel’nykh resheniy dlya krupnogo goroda [Informational basis for making urban planning decisions for a large city]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvenogo universiteta – Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, 2011, no. 9 (128), pp. 153–159 (in Russian).
13. Dvir Ron. Knowledge City, seen as a Collage of Human Knowledge Moments. URL: http://innovationecology.com/papers/knowledge%20city%20human%20moments%20dvir1.pdf (ac-cessed 12 June 2021).
14. Bulanov M. V., Barayeva V. S. Antikonferentsiya kak obrazovatel’naya situatsiya [Anti-conference as an educational situation]. T’yutorstvo v otkrytom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve: obrazovatel’naya situatsiya i t’yutorskaya deyatel’nost’: materialy XII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (XXIV Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya), Moskva, 29–30 oktyabrya 2019 g. [Tutoring in open educational space: educational situation and tutoring activities: Proceedings of the XII International Scientific-Practical Conference (XXIV All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference), Moscow, October 29–30, 2019]. Moscow, Mezhregional’naya t’yutorskaya assotsiatsiya Publ., 2019. Pp. 50–61 (in Russian).
15. Asonova E. A., Rossinskaya A. N., Bulanov M. V. Kak gorod mozhet i dolzhen izmenyt’ pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye [How the city can and should change teacher education]. UniverCity: Goroda i Universitety [UniverCity: Cities and Universities]. Moscow, Econ-Inform Publ., 2020. Pp. 31–48 (in Russian).
16. Khabitat III Issledovatel’skiye doklady. 11 – Obschestvennoye prostranstvo [Habitat III Research Papers. 11 – Public space]. New York, 2015 (in Russian). URL: http://uploads.habitat3.org/hb3/11-Habitat-III-Issue-Paper-11_Public-Space_rus-AI_fin.pdf (accessed 12 June 2021).
17. Golushko T. K. Obrazovatel’nyy potentsial Tambovskoy oblasty: problem i perspektivy [Educational potential of the Tambov region: problems and prospects]. Science Vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy, Psychology, 2015, no. 3 (22), pp. 43–50 (in Russian).
18. Ekimova N.A. Obrazovatel’nyy potentsial regionov Rossii [Educational potential of the re-gions of Russia] (in Russian). URL: https://kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/_21 (accessed 1 July 2021).
19. Kovaleva T. M. Materialy kursa «Osnovy tyutorskogo soprovozhdeniya v obschem obra-zovanii»: lestsii 5–8 [Materials of the course “Fundamentals of tutor support in general education”: lectures 5–8]. Moscow, Pedagogical University “Pervoye sentyabrya” Publ., 2010. 64 с (in Russian).
( 367.65 kB ) 
( 357.84 kB )
Issue: 6, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Pages: 236 — 245
Downloads: 983