TOLERANCE TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE PROBLEM OF FUNCTIONING OF PSYCHOLOGICAL BOUNDARIES OF THE INDIVIDUAL AT THE STAGE OF YOUTH
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-5-175-181
The article deals with the problem of personality functioning in the conditions of modern uncertainty and variability. This research focuses on the relationship between tolerance to uncertainty and psychological boundaries of personality in youth. The concepts of tolerance and intolerance to uncertainty, psychological boundaries are considered; the relationship between the considered constructs is substantiated. An empirical study of the specifics of the relationship between tolerance to uncertainty and the functions of psychological boundaries of young people is conducted. During the experiment, the following methods were used:» New questionnaire of tolerance-intolerance to uncertainty «(T. V. Kornilova),» Method of diagnostics of psychological borders of personality « (T. S. Levi). The experimental study revealed the predominance of tolerance to uncertainty (including interpersonal tolerance to uncertainty) and the lack of formation of the psychological border in the period of youth. The relationship between the following indicators is established: non-admitting, restraining functions of psychological boundaries and interpersonal tolerance to uncertainty; tolerance to uncertainty and a combination of high values for non-admitting, restraining and low values for permeable, neutral, absorbing functions of psychological boundaries. The results of the study indicate inflexibility, maladaptivity, rigidity, impenetrability and closeness of psychological boundaries of young people, difficulties in exchanging information and energy between the external and internal space, perception of uncertainty as a threat, avoiding situations of inconsistency and variability, and avoiding contacts. The identified features contribute to the growth of stagnating trends, victimization, and hinder personal development and growth. The results obtained can be used to build programs for psychological and pedagogical support of young people in terms of activating their internal psychological resources necessary for effective functioning in the conditions of continuous challenges of everyday reality.
Keywords: tolerance to indeterminacy, tolerance to uncertainty, interpersonal tolerance to uncertainty, psychological boundaries, youth
References:
1. Frenkel-Brunswik E. Intolerance of Ambiguity as an Emotional and Perceptual Variable. Journal of Personality, 1949, vol. 18, pp. 108–143.
2. Budner S. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 1962, vol. 30, pp. 29–40.
3. Furnham A., Ribchester T. Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Current Psychology, 1995, vol. 14 (3), pp. 179–199.
4. Lifintsev D. V., Serykh A. B., Lifintseva A. A. Tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti v kontekste sotsial’noy podderzhki: gendernaya spetsifika yunosti [Tolerance to uncertainty in the context of social support: gender specificity in the youth environment]. Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – National Psychological Journal, 2017, no. 2 (26), pp. 98–105 (in Russian).
5. Bergis T. A. Gotovnost’ lichnosti k peremenam i tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti na etape ranney vzroslosti [Openness to changes and uncertainty tolerance of a person in early adulthood]. Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya – Science Vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology, 2015, no. 4 (23), pp. 38–42 (in Russian).
6. Kornilova T. V., Chumakova M. A. Shkaly tolerantnosti i intolerantnosti k neopredelennosti v modifikatsii oprosnika S. Badnera [Tolerance and intolerance of ambiguity in the modification of Budner’s questionnaire]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya – Experimental Psychology, 2014, no. 1, pp. 46–54 (in Russian).
7. Pushkina A. V. Sootnosheniye perfektsionizma i tolerantnosti k neopredelennosti [Features of perfectionists tolerance to uncertainty]. Psikhologiya obucheniya – Psychology of education, 2016, no. 1, pp. 95–101 (in Russian).
8. Votintseva T. S., Petrenko V. R. Vzaimosvyaz’ urovnya tolerantnosti k neopredelennosti i psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya lichnosti [The interdependence of the level of tolerance for uncertainty and personal psychological well-being]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya – Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2016, no. 4, pp. 145–149 (in Russian).
9. Leonov I. N. Tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti kak psikhologicheskiy fenomen: istoriya stanovleniya konstrukta [Tolerance for ambiguity as a psychological phenomenon: the history of a construct ]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika – Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2014, no. 4, pp. 43–52 (in Russian).
10. Zotova E. Yu. Tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti v zarubezhnoy psikhologii [The relationship between tolerance to ambiguity achievement motivation]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya – Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, 2009, tom 3, no. 1, pp. 147–155 (in Russian).
11. Hartmann E. Boundaries in the Mind: A New Psychology of Personality. New York: Basic Books, 1991. 288 p.
12. Brown N. W. The Destructive narcissistic pattern. Westport, Connecticut, London, 1998. 200 p.
13. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Psikhologiya suverennosti: desyat’ let spustya [Psychology of sovereignty: ten years later]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2017. 200 p. (in Russian).
14. Silina O. V. Struktura granits Ya u detey 2–10 let [The structure of the boundaries I for children of 2–10 years]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo – Social Psychology and Society, 2016, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 83–98 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17759/sps.2016070406
15. Shapoval I. A., Fominykh E. S. Samootnosheniye kak fenomenologicheskoye pole diagnostiki psikhologicheskikh granits lichnosti i eye zdorov’ya [Self-attitude as a phenamenological field of diagnosis of psychological boundaries of the personality]. Klinicheskaya i spetsial’naya psikhologiya – Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2018, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–27 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17759/cpse.2018070102
16. Ryaguzova E. V. Sotsiokul’turnye kody i psikhologicheskiye granitsy sosedstva [Socio-cultural Codes and Psychological Boundaries of Neighbourship]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika – Izvestiya of Saratov University. New series. The Series Of Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 89–94 (in Russian).
17. Shamshikova E. O., Arkhipova T. S. Spetsifika vremennoy perspektivy lichnosti s raznymi tipami psikhologicheskikh granits [Specifics of the time perspective of a person with different types of psychological boundaries]. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa – Journal of practical psychology, 2015, no. 4, pp. 57–70 (in Russian).
18. Levi T. S. Metodika diagnostiki psikhologicheskoy granitsy lichnosti [A technique for diagnosing psychological boundaries of personality]. Voprosy psikhologii – Voprosy Psychologii, 2013, no. 1, pp. 131–146 (in Russian).
19. Levi T. S. Strukturno-funktsional’nyy podkhod k diagnostike i korrektsii psikhologicheskoy granitsy lichnosti [Structural and functional approach to the diagnosis and correction of psychological boundaries of personality]. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa – Journal of Practical Psychology, 2015, no. 4, pp. 14–25 (in Russian).
( 338.05 kB ) 
( 329.56 kB )
Issue: 5, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 175 — 181
Downloads: 548