THE LOGIC OF BUILDING A THEORETICAL MODEL OF THE PROCESS OF PEDAGOGICAL SUPPORT OF PUPILS’ CHOICE OF PROFESSION BY THE DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT RESOURCES
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-5-22-29
The education system faces the issues of online education and the effectiveness of career guidance programs in schools. The article deals with the problem of organizing pedagogical support for profession choice in the school digital educational environment. The author rises the question of theoretical understanding and modeling of the process of pedagogical support of professional choice by the digital educational environment resources. The author presents the 9-componet model and the logic of its construction. The model presents characteristics of each of the following components: the task, the environmental component, the subjective component, the methodological component, the motivational activity component, the diagnostic component, the results, the reflection as well as the specificity of the relationships between these components. The peculiarity of this model is the absence of a clear hierarchy changed for the interdependence of the components. This feature is characteristic of pedagogical models in the formation of a new concept of education. The author pays attention to the particularities of the usage of the approaches, principles and methods of the pedagogical support of the professional choice in the conditions of the digital educational environment. The author also considers the selection of the digital educational environment means to solve the problem of the pedagogical support of the schoolchildren’s professional choice.
Keywords: pedagogical support, professional choice, digital educational environment
References:
1. Sherman Ya. Ot “odryva” k innovatsiyam: o budushchem MOOK [From Disruption to Innovation: Thoughts on the Future of MOOCs]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies, 2018, no. 4, pp. 21–43 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ot-podryva-k-innovatsiyam-o-buduschem-mook (accessed 9 April 2020). DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-4-21-43
2. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii dla obtcheobrazovatel’nykh organizatsiy v chasti opredeleniya vidov trudovoy deyatel’nosti obuchaushikhsya v ramkakh obrazovatel’noy deyatel’nosti s uchetom vozrastnykh i psikhofisiologicheskikh osobennostey obuchaushchikhsya, utverzhdenniye Porucheniyen Pravitel’stva PR-1191 i kompleksa mer po razvitiyu i samorealizatsii uchashchikhsya v protsesse vospitaniaya i obucheniya na 2016–2020 gody ot 27 iunya 2016 g. No 4455p-P8, utvergdennogo zamestitelem Predsedatelya Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii Golodets O. Y. [Guidelines for educational institutions determining the types of students labor activities in the educational activities considering with the age and psychophysiological characteristics of students, approved by The Government Commission GC-1191 and a set of measures for students development and self-realization during the process of education and training for 2016–2020 years from June, 27 2016 No 4455p-P8, approved by the Assistant of the Chairman of the Russian Federation O. Y. Golodets] (in Russian). URL: www.apkpro.ru/doc/Методрекомендации_трудовая%20деятельность.pdf (accessed 3 August 2020).
3. Belousova A. K. Formirovaniye gotovnosti obuchaushchikhsya k vyboru professii v obrazovatel’nom prostranstve regional’noy sistemi obrazobavoya. Dis. kand. ped. nauk [Formation of the students’ readiness to choose a profession in the educational space of the regional educational system]. Abakan, 2019. 320 p. (in Russian).
4. Pedagogoka: uchebnoye posobiye dlya vuzoz. Pod redaktsiyey P. I. Pidkasistogo. 2-e izdaniye [Pedagogy: textbook for universities edited by P. I. Pidkasistiy, 2nd edition]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ, 2011. 502 p. (in Russian).
5. Kh’elle L., Ziedler D. Teorii lichnosti [Personality Theories]. Saint Petersbourg, Piter Publ., 2019. 608 p. (in Russian).
6. Delen E., Liew J., Willson V. Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 2014, vol. 78, рр. 312–320. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.018
7. Jansen R. S., van Leeuwen A., Janssen J., Conijn R., Kester L. Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 2020, vol. 146. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771
8. Pryazhnikov N. S. Professional’noye samoopredeleniye: teoriya i praktika [Professional self-determination: theory and practice]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2007. 501 p. (in Russian).
9. Rogach O. V., Frolova E. V., Ryabova T. M. Modern School Role in Human Potential Development. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2018, no. 7, pp. 804–812. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2018.4.804.
10. Chistyakova S. N., Roditchev N. F., Sergeyev I. S. Kriterii i pokazateli gotovnosti obutchayushchikhsya k professional’nomu samoopredeleniyu [Criteria and indicators of students readiness for professional self-determination]. Professional’noye obrazovaniye. Stolitsa, 2016, no. 8, pp. 10–16 (in Russian).
( 635.19 kB ) 
( 618.91 kB )
Issue: 5, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: GENERAL EDUCATION
Pages: 22 — 29
Downloads: 410