MASTER IN SCHOOL: TO BE OR NOT TO BE
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-2-30-34
In this article, the author considers the issue of the position of masters in school and the position of the heads of secondary schools for master’s training. Based on the study of difficulties in the process of studying at a magistracy, the author found that the school does not create conditions for successful learning, because the leaders do not show interest in the master’s training of a teacher. Based on the results of a survey of the heads of secondary schools, the researcher concludes that employers do not see fundamental importance in the multi-level training of the teacher, since the functions and types of activities of masters in the school are not legally fixed. At the same time, school principals are ready to create conditions for the training of teachers in the magistracy, to involve in research and design and management activities, in pedagogical support of work to improve the activities of school teachers, to include them in the school management team. The author outlines the problem of recruitment from the point of view of the distribution of master figures for admission to the magistracy, which is caused by the lack of interest of employers in the master’s training of the teacher.
Keywords: two-level training, bachelor, master, teacher, standard, higher education, functions and activities
References:
1. Prikaz Minobrnauki Rossii ot 22.02.2018 N 126 “Ob utverzhdenii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta vysshego obrazovaniya – magistratura po napravleniyu podgotovki 44.04.01 “Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye” (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 15.03.2018 N 50361) [Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated 22.02.2018, no. 126 “On approval of the federal state educational standard of higher education – master’s program in the direction of preparation 44.04.01 Pedagogical education” (Registered in the Ministry of Justice of Russia on March 15, 2018 no. 50361)] (in Russian). URL: http://fgosvo.ru/fgosvo/152/150/25/117 (accessed 16 January 2020)
2. Prikaz Mintruda Rossii ot 18.10.2013 N 544n (s izm. ot 25.12.2014) «Ob utverzhdenii professional’nogo standarta “Pedagog (pedagogicheskaya deyatel’nost’ v sfere doshkol’nogo, nachal’nogo obshchego, osnovnogo obshchego, srednego obshchego obrazovaniya) (vospitatel’, uchitel’)” [Order of the Ministry of Labor of Russia dated 18 October 2013 N 544n (as amended on 25 December 2014) “On approval of the professional standard “Teacher (pedagogical activity in the field of preschool, primary general, basic general, secondary general education) (educator, teacher)”] (in Russian). URL: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfi les/profstandart/01.001.pdf (accessed 15 January 2020).
3. Baydenko V. I., Selezneva N. A. Konkurentnosposobnye obrazovatel’nye programmy: k formirovaniyu kontseptsii [Competitive educational programs: towards conceptualization]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye segodnya, 2011, no. 5, pp. 24–29 (in Russian).
4. Nikulina E. G. Izmeneniya v soderzhanii professional’noy podgotovki v magistrature pedagogicheskogo vuza. Dis. ... kand. ped. nauk [Changes in the content of vocational training in the master’s program of a pedagogical university. Diss. cand. of ped. sci.]. Omsk, 2015. 340 p. (in Russian).
5. Sergeyeva T. I., Vinokurova T. S., Tatarinova V. A. Obucheniye v magistrature kak faktor lichnostnogo i professional’nogo razvitiya pedagoga [Teaching in the magistracy as a factor in the personal and professional development of a teacher]. Nauchnometodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal “Kontsept”, 2015, vol. 26, pp. 491–495 (in Russian). URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/95383.htm (accessed 17 January 2020).
6. Galkina Ye. A., Makarova O. B., Marina A. V., Iashvili M. V. Organizatsionno-pedagogicheskiye trebovaniya k programmam magistratury v usloviyakh vvedeniya professional’nogo standarta pedagoga i modernizatsii pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [Organizational and pedagogical requirements for master’s programs in the context of the introduction of a professional standard for teachers and the modernization of teacher education]. Vestnik pedagogicheskikh innovatsiy – Bulletin of pedagogical innovation, 2017, no. 4 (48), pp. 35–50 (in Russian).
7. Pozdeyeva S. I. Magistratura kak prostranstvo professional’no-lichnostnogo razvitiya studenta i prepodavatelya [Master’s degree environment as a space for personal professional development of students and professors]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2018, no. 3, pp. 144–151 (in Russian).
8. Smyshlyayeva L.G., Neradovskaya O.R., Matveyev D.M., Smyshlyayev A.V. Obrazovatel’nyy potentsial integratsii neformal’nogo obrazovaniya i praktik magisterskoy podgotovki [Educational potential of the integration of nonformal education and the practice of master training]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2019, vol. 6 (28), pp. 122–132 (in Russian).
( 368.56 kB ) 
( 361.23 kB )
Issue: 2, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: TEACHER TRAINING
Pages: 30 — 34
Downloads: 447