FEATURES OF TEACHERS’ ACTIVITY EVALUATION AT TOMSK NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2019-1-139-143
In many modern universities, especially in research ones, the process of revising approaches and indicators for assessing the quality of teaching is now actively underway, which we propose to consider as innovative and, of course, progressive. The focus has shifted from actual assessing the quality of education to the assessment of teachers’ activity, which he performs or does not perform. In the event of non-compliance with indicators in elections, the lecturer is elected for a shorter term or not elected at all. These figures at a minimum reflect the quality of training in any assessment. In the election for the posts of teaching staff, a very narrow and very specific set of indicators of educational activity, primary to universities, is taken into account, among other things (consider the indicators on the example of research Tomsk State University): the number of qualified candidates and doctors of sciences; the number of dissertations prepared under the guidance of a teacher; the number of credits of courses taught in a foreign language, with the use of electronic resources, or, project, research; the number of prizes engaged by the students, leading teachers, competitions, contests, etc.; the management of basic educational programs. All these factors only indirectly indicate the quality of teaching. Thus, we can confidently say that in Tomsk scientific research universities there is a tendency to quasi-innovations in the evaluation of teaching, as organizational innovations contribute to the reduction of work time standards, increase in productivity, improve of the workflow, and psychological climate in the team. Organizational quasi-innovations can not produce such effects, on the contrary, they lead to conflicts, increase of working time norms, general dissatisfaction with the management and the injustice of the system of procedure election to the office, as well as the loss of qualified personnel.
Keywords: quality of teaching, evaluation of teacher’s activity
References:
1. Bulatova A. S. Iskusstvo sovremennogo uroka: uchebnoye podsobiye [Modern art lesson: study guide]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2006. 253 p. (in Russian).
2. Gumanitarnyye nauki: Psikhologiya i sotsiologiya obrazovaniya. Nauchnyy redactor S. D. Smirnov [Humanities: psychology and sociology of education. Scientifi c editor S. D. Smirnov]. Moscow, University for the Humanities Publ., 2005. 215 p. (in Russian).
3. Kireeva E. Yu., Sozonova S. D. Kachestvo prepodavaniya uchebnykh distsiplin v vuze. Kriterii otsenki [The quality of teaching in higher education. Evaluation criteria] (in Russian). URL: http://elib.altstu.ru/elib/disser/conferenc/2007/kat/pdf/Section3/476-493.pdf (accessed 12 September 2017).
4. Kubanov R. Standarty otsenivaniya kachestva prepodavaniya v vuze [Standards of teaching quality evaluation in higher education] (in Russian). URL: http://gisap.eu/ru/node/116909 (accessed 12 September 2017).
5. Kudryavtseva N. V. Razmyshleniya ob iskusstve prepodavaniya [Refl ections on the art of teaching] (in Russian). URL: http://sun.tsu.ru/limit/2016/000400733.pdf (accessed 26 September 2017).
6. Litsyun C. Razmyshleniya ob otsenke kachestva prepodavaniya [Refl ections on the assessment of the quality of teaching] (in Russian). URL: https://moluch.ru/th/4/archive/4/10/ (accessed 1 October 2017).
7. Pastukhova E. N. Kachestvo prepodavaniya spetsyal’nykh distsiplin na ekonomicheskom fakul’tete [The quality of teaching of special disciplines at the faculty of Economy]. Sotsiologicheskiy ezhegodnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Sociological Yearbook of Kemerovo State University]. 2001, pp. 37–53 (in Russian).
8. Rimskaya O. N. Motivatsiya prepodavateley vuzov v sisteme menedzhenta kachestva obrazovaniya [The motivation of teachers of higher educational institutions in the system of management of quality education]. Tomsk, Grafi ka Publ., 2006. 121 p. (in Russian).
9. Khoreeva N. K., Daragan S. V. Monitoringovyye issledovaniya po povysheniyu kachestva obrasovaniya v vuze [Monitoring studies to improve the quality of education in higher education] (in Russian). URL: http://i-exam.ru/sites/default/files/Savchenkov_V._Information_technologies.pdf (accessed 10 October 2017).
10. Chandra M. Yu. Tekhnologiya monitoringa kachestva prepodavaniya v vuze [The technology of monitoring the quality of teaching in higher education]. Diskussiya – Discussion, 2014, vol. 4 (in Russian). URL: http://www.journal-discussion.ru/publication.php?id=1091 (accessed 16 October 2017).
( 386.69 kB ) 
( 380.35 kB )
Issue: 1, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: PEDAGOGICAL ACTIVITY
Pages: 139 — 143
Downloads: 913