UNDERSTANDING AS A UNIT OF EDUCATION CONTENT
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2017-1-173-177
Understanding in the pedagogical context has always been regarded as one of the results of education. In pedagogy of collaborative activity this act has a special educational content. On the basis of the analysis of literature there can be allocated three functions of understanding: sense and meaning generating function, cognitive function and psychological function. Focusing on the attainment of the other person’s goals and motives a person rules out the possibility of understanding for the use of knowledge of the world (G. Ruzavin). In hermeneutics (E. Betty, G. Gadamer, Husserl, Heidegger) understanding involves, first of all, the knowledge of the outside world through the interpretation of texts. This representation makes it necessary to discuss the concept of pre-understanding, based on the «life» of the world and cultural tradition. And in this case, the act of understanding does not involve the joint nature of this action. As a result of the analysis of literature it is suggested that the generation of meaning is considered as a basic understanding of the function, the educational potential and educational content for maximum understanding and action is a condition for the establishment and implementation of the other functions of understanding: cognitive and psychological. It is in the pedagogy of collaborative activity the organization of the situations of understanding is seen as an act of generation of meaning, and it is considered as a basic characteristic of the educational content of the joint action and the basic part of educational content. Reliance on the meaning-function, as the basic organization of the work involves description, discussion and study of various personal experiences of the collaborative education. Understanding in this case is a situation causing collaborative education. This approach to educational content unit solves the problem of formalization of educational activities in schools, and fist of all the formalization of the implementation of the federal state educational standard of education of the new generation. It reduces the manipulative actions of adult and child at classes. And it serves as a condition for the formation of the character of the author’s actions as a result of education process and as an alternative to the normative and subjective nature of these actions.
Keywords: understanding, joint activity, joint action, education content, organization of the understanding situations
References:
1. Prozumentova G. N. Kontseptsiya razvitiya Shkoly Sovmestnoy deyatel`nosti: izmeneniye sposoba tseleobtazovaniya v pedagogicheskoy praktike [The concept of the School of joint activity: change in the way of goal formation in pedagogical practice]. Shkola Sovmestnoy deyatel`nosti: kontseptsiya, proekty, praktika razvitiya. Pod red. G. N. Prozumentovoy [School of Joint activities: concept, projects, practice of development. Ed. G. N. Prozumentova]. Tomsk, 1997. Book1, part 1. Pp. 10–51 (in Russian).
2. Prozumentova G. N. Obrazovaniye sub’’ekta sovmestnoy deyatel`nosti – problema izmeneniya soderzhaniya obrazovaniya v shkole [Formation of the subject of joint activity – the problem of changing the content of education at school]. Shkola Sovmestnoy deyatel`nosti. Izmeneniye soderzhaniya obrazovaniya v razvivayushcheysya shkole. Pod red. G. N. Prozumentovoy, E. N. Kovalevskoy [School of Joint activities. Changing the content of education in developing school. Ed. G. N. Prozumentova, E. N. Kovalevskaya]. Tomsk, 2000. Book 3, part 3. Pp. 106–136 (in Russian).
3. Prozumentova G. N. Pedagogika sovmestnoy deyatel`nosti: smyslovye konteksty i obrazovatel`naya real`nost` [Pedagogy of joint activities: semantic contexts and educational reality]. Shkola Sovmestnoy deyatel`nosti: razrabotka obrazovatel`nykh program v razvivayushcheysya shkole. Pod. red. G. N. Prozumentovoy [School of Joint activity: the development of educational programs in developing school. Ed. G. N. Prozumentova]. Tomsk, Del`taplan Publ., 2002. Book 5. Pp. 4–16 (in Russian).
4. Kolpakov S. N. Obrazovatel’noye soderzhaniye sovmestnogo deystviya i ego vliyaniye na osvoeniye uchebnogo materiala (na materiale organizatsii zanyatiy po fizike v obshcheobrazovatel’noy shkole). Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [The educational content of the joint action and its impact on the development of educational material (based on the organization studies of physics in secondary school). Abstract of thesis cand. of ped. sci.]. Tomsk, 2012. 24 p. (in Russian).
5. Kolpakov S. N. Рonimaniye i ponyatiye obrazovatel`nogo soderzhaniya sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti v shkole [Understanding and concept of tducational content of joint activities in the School]. Obrazovatel`noye soderzhaniye sovmestnoy deyatel`nosti vzroslykh i detey v shkole: upravleniye i stanovleniye. Pod red. G. N. Prozumentovoy, S. I. Pozdeevoy [Educational content of the joint activity of adults and children at school: management and formation. Ed. G. N. Prozumentova, S. I. Pozdeeva]. Tomsk, 2015. 288 p. (in Russian).
6. Ruzavin G.I. Kontseptsii sovremennogo estestvoznaniya: uchebnoye posobiye [Concepts of modern science: tutorial]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2006. 303 p. (in Russian).
7. Emilio Betti. Germenevtika kak obshchaya metodologiya nauk o dukhe [Hermeneutics as the general methodology of the human sciences] Per. s nem. E. V. Borisov. Moscow, «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya» Publ., 2011. 144 p. (in Russian).
8. Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. Per. s nem.; obshch. red. i vstup. st. B. N. Bessonova [Truth and method: Fundamentals of philosophical hermeneutics. Translation from German; ed. and introd. article by B. N. Bessonov]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988. 704 p. (in Russian).
9. Gusserl’ E. Krizis evropeyskikh nauk i transtsendental’naya fenomenologiya: Vvedeniye v fenomenologicheskuyu filosofiyu [Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: an introduction to phenomenological philosophy]. Voprosy filosofii – Problems of philosophy, 1992, no. 7 (in Russian).
10. Haydegger M. Bytiye i vremya. Per. s nem. V. V. Bibikhina [Being and Time. Translated from German by V. V. Bibikhin]. Har’kov, Folio Publ., 2003. 503, [9] p. (Philosophy) (in Russian).
11. Mamardashvili M. K. Vil’nyusskiye lektsii po sotsial’noy filosofii (Opyt fizicheskoy metafiziki) [Vilnius lectures on social philosophy (metaphysics of physical experience)]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 2012. 320 p. (in Russian).
12. Bakhtin M. M. Iskusstvo i otvetstvennost’; K filosofii postupka; Avtor i geroy v esteticheskoy deyatel’nosti; problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve [Art and responsibility; Philosophy of act; Author and character in aesthetic activity; Problem of the content, material and form in verbal art creativity]. Kiev, NEXT Publ., 1994. 384 p. (in Russian).
13. Mamardashvili M. K. Estetika myshleniya [Thinking esthetics]. Filosofskiye chteniya [Philosophical reading]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika Publ., 2002 (in Russian).
14. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0dIck01AjA
( 383.01 kB ) 
( 375.11 kB )
Issue: 1, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES
Pages: 173 — 177
Downloads: 1082